User talk:RobertEves92/Archive 1

Thanks

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my talk page! fetchcomms☛ 21:37, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No Problem. KiraChinmoku _{(T, ¤)}21:37, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Double Thanks

(Jordan S. Wilson (talk) 23:24, 19 February 2010 (UTC)) Greeting Fellow Wikipedian, Thanks for refilling my page. If you see on you page I have created some barnstar for you. If you need anything you let me know.[reply]

User blanking of articles

I notice that you recently reverted an edit where the author of the article Department of postgraduate education had blanked that article, and you placed a warning on that user's talk page, using Huggle. However, it is generally accepted that if the author of an article blanks the article, and no other user has added any significant content, then the blanking is taken as indicating that the author wants the page deleted, and it can then be tagged for speedy deletion with {{db-blanked}}. Very often new users who don't know how Wikipedia works see an article they have created tagged for deletion, accept that the article should be deleted, and remove the content, thinking that is deleting it. It is much better in such a case not to bite the newcomer by giving them a warning that they have done something wrong by trying to comply with the deletion notice. You may know all this already: I know from my own experience of using Huggle that it is very easy to slip into simply clicking on the revert button and moving on without checking the edit carefully enough, but I thought it would not harm to mention this. I have taken the liberty of removing the user warning: please restore it if you think there is a good reason why it should be there. JamesBWatson(talk) 15:22, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can only apologise for this, occasionally it is very easy to do this without realising. However i do have a lot of experience with huggle, and as you have said from your experience too it is all too easy for this to happen. Again i can only apologise that this has happened. KiraChinmoku _{(T, ¤)}21:22, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am also in the process of modifying the huggle sourcecode to make it harder for these things to happen by checking the creator of the page against last edits to see if this is what may have happened. KiraChinmoku _(T,¤) 21:47, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No apology is needed: I was just letting you know in case you didn't realise. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:34, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What?

In no way did Jpgordon ask me to "leave". Please stop inhibiting my attempts to get to know Josh.Hiineedrequestforcomment (talk) 21:06, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your RfA...

...is failing, as there are 0 supports, 10 opposes, and 1 neutral. Please consider withdrawing your RfA soon.December21st2012Freak ^{Happy St. Patrick's Day!} 23:44, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I wont be withdrawing it for one reason. That reason being if it is closed i will miss out on alot of comments. Comments left on the RFA will help me to improve for the next time i try. This is because i cant see where i am going wrong, so comments help, what i cant see others can, and comments like yours will help me to improve my work on wikipedia. KiraChinmoku _{(T, ¤)} 23:49, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An RfA, once it has been transcluded and several users have !voted in it, does not qualify for CSD G7. If you wish to withdraw the RfA, the correct way to do so is to post a withdrawing statement below your self-nom statement. After the RfA is closed and archived, you can request courtesy blanking. However, closed RfAs are generally not deleted. Nsk92 (talk) 00:29, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks, ill go do that now. KiraChinmoku_{(T, ¤)} 00:30, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your RFA has been closed

I regret to inform you that your RFA has been closed (per your request) as unsuccessful. I recommend reviewing the comments made by those participating in the discussion there to determine what you can do to improve your chances in the future, should you choose to run again. I also strongly recommend involving yourself in areas where admins work (WP:AFD/TFD/CFD/MFD, WP:CSD, WP:AIV, etc.) and become very familiar with how they work. Reading Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship and the information found atWikipedia:Administrators#Becoming an administrator (especially the links there). Please let me know if you have any questions. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 01:02, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Boolean logic

Minor nitpick on the clever code from your user page:

assert((x == true) == x); // Will never throw an exception, regardless of the value of x

Or, as most logicians would agree, the statement "x is true" is functionally equivalent to the simpler statement "x."

Best wishes, Mike Duskis (talk) 05:10, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks muchly KiraChinmoku _{(T, ¤)}11:05, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Flight Avia Flight 7100

Re this edit, you added a parent cat to the article. Category:Aviation accidents and incidents in Ireland is a sub-category ofCategory:Aviation in Ireland. No major harm done, I've removed the parent cat. Mjroots (talk) 13:28, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah ok, thanks mate. --KiraChinmoku _{(T, ¤)} 13:08, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free files in your user space

Hey there Kirachinmoku, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. Iremoved some files I found on User:Kirachinmoku/TT.

See a log of files removed today here.
Shut off the bot here.
Report errors here.
If you have any questions, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:02, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2014 FIFA World Cup scores.

Hello, Weather it has a reliable source or not, It still doesn't change the fact that wikipedia is not a live scoring system site.Skyblueshaun (talk) 14:01, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The MIP template exists for a reason. Although wikipedia is not a live score website, if users choose to update match scores and the information is correct and verifiable, which in this case it is, there is no point reverting it. Wikipedia is an excellent source of information and the more up to date it is the better. To the best of my knowledge there is no part of Wikipedias policy that says you cannot update sports match scores live KiraChinmoku (T, ¤) 3:04 pm, Today (UTC+1)

I have reported your issue to people higher up in wikipedia and they should get back to you. I would like to tell you that I got banned from editing on wikipedia for using live scores, So I am not messing around here. Skyblueshaun (talk) 14:08, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The person you have passed this on to is not an administrator and therefore cannot make decisions regarding this matter. There is no part of policy that says that live score information is not allowed on wikipedia. Please get an actual administrator / sysop / Jimmy Wales to contact me regarding the rules of this matter. Until then I shall remain rollbacking and protecting good faith edits that are reliable and have citations. I'm not doing this to be a pain or cause problems to you or anyone else, I'm simply doing it because the information is correct and reliable and therefore has every right to be on the relevent page as part of Wikipedia. Best Regards KiraChinmoku _{(T, ¤)}14:15, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Both of you should consider this a final warring about edit warring, carry on and I will block both of you, and Kira I have to agree with Shaun here, do you not see the pointlessness in adding live scores when you could just wait 90 minutes and then add them? Or are you intending to do this for every sporting event ever? --Jac16888 ^Talk 14:29, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Very well. I would however like to point out that every edit I made was in good faith to others and I can't help but feel Shaun jumped the gun a little reporting me for vandalism, which quite frankly was unnecessary. KiraChinmoku _{(T, ¤)} 14:34, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You exacerbated the situation by reverting Shaun rather than discussing properly - please adhere to WP:BRD in the future.--Jac16888 ^Talk 14:37, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I attempted to discuss it, I was even "told" it wasn't allowed, but up until a few mins ago I was offered no proof that is wasn't allowed. And I'm not naive enough to simply believe something just because someone says it is true. Anyway, the matter has been dealt with so thats it over. Thank-you for your comments Jac KiraChinmoku _(T,¤) 14:41, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Revert

Regarding this edit: I wouldn't consider this vandalism (it's a legitimate link), but I'm also reluctant to un-revert it because I'm not sure how notable it is. I'm not that familiar with Wikipedia policies, so if you could take a look at it that would be great. Thanks! --Lethosor (talk) 17:44, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. I jumped the gun, your edit was in fact fine. KiraChinmoku _(T,¤) 17:48, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't actually my edit, but thanks anyway. :) --Lethosor (talk) 17:54, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Markham (field hockey)

Some of the tags are rather puzzling - how is the article outdated? St Anselm (talk) 21:26, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately some of wikipedia's tags are poorly named, that one is listed as "page requires updating" which is misleading. What I mean was the page requires updating with more information, not that the information is out of date as the tag would indicate.KiraChinmoku _{(T, ¤)}21:30, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, OK. Of course, this is what the whole stub system is supposed to be about. That's what I created - a stub. If you like, you could use Template:Missing information or Template:Incomplete. St Anselm (talk) 21:34, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Updated: Page now has stub tag replacing the tags I placed earlier

Stortford, Essex redirect

I declined your request for speedy deletion, primarily because the redirect was not "recently created" but has been around for several months now. I also think that an argument might be made that, even though factually inaccurate the redirect is still potentially useful, as the town is on the border of Essex according to Bishop's Stortford. At any rate, I think it's better to discuss it at WP:RFD. Cheers, postdlf (talk) 20:25, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't care. — Preceding unsigned comment added byAncientwishes (talk • contribs) 22:08, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yep that's fair enough. Thanks for your comment. KiraChinmoku _(T,¤) 22:49, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Waytemore Castle, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Norse and Convex (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Zyngfing etc page protection requests

Hi there. Just to let you know, both the pages you asked to be protected already are, and were already yesterday when you asked. It's a feature of the software that you might not be able to see that protection, but you certainly won't be able to create the article, only an admin can. Thanks. Ged UK 11:13, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah smashing, thanks for the clarification. Is there any way at all to tell for future reference? KiraChinmoku _{(T, ¤)} 11:47, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Try and edit the page. If you can't, it's protected. If you can, it's not (or only semi-salted). Ged UK 11:59, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on my talk

I replied before I realised your note said to reply here. 2.102.187.12 (talk) 16:53, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reporting on Admin boards

Note: Thank you for your help by reporting vandalism. You reported the same user at AIV and UAA at about the same time. Please report only once and to the more appropriate board. In this case the user was blocked temporarily for adding spam. Although AIV is for vandalism (which this was not) it is ok to use for blatant spammers. Your report to UAA was unnecessary and not applicable as the username is not in violation. Thanks for your help. -- Alexf^(talk) 16:58, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for that, I'll remember that in future. Wasn't sure what the general procedure was so reported on both to play it safe.KiraChinmoku _{(T, ¤)} 17:00, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

NP. We were all beginners in need of learning at one point. The boards are sometimes overwhelmed, so adding unnecessary reports does not help. Cheers. -- Alexf^(talk) 17:02, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You did it again on User:Royharter at UAA and AIV. besides, the user has had no warnings whatsoever as of this writing, whic is needed, and I fail to see the case for UAA. Please read the board's rules published there. Thank you. -- Alexf^(talk) 16:24, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry once again, user was reported due to username linking with 2 articles I consider to be G11 (one of which has an identical name to the user, see Roy Harter), clicked to warn the user about the removal of speedy deletion tags which sent a vandalism report. Wasn't my intention to post 2 separate reports. KiraChinmoku 16:29, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Stortford Music Festival Logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Stortford Music Festival Logo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letterhere. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:20, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I can get proof of permission however it may take longer than a week. The original permission came verbally so obviously there is no proof of that. Would a screenshot of an email suffice? KiraChinmoku _(T,¤) 09:34, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A copy of the e-mail(or a screenshot) to the address listed should work.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:36, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your message

you recently reverted my edit to Peter Cushing saying that i did not explain my edit. If you pay attention a little better you will see that I did explain the edit as: unnecessary info, it belongs on the Sherlock Holmes and Van Helsing page not on a personal Bio.67.170.169.30 (talk) 22:10, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, occasionally Huggle doesn't show edit summaries, or shows them as not having left one. But yes you are right you did leave one. KiraChinmoku _{(T, ¤)}09:31, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stop undoing my changes.

The content is cited. Read the page. Learn something. Shill.

The section is cited, your changes are not. KiraChinmoku _(T,¤) 14:07, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

They are now, and they were cited all over this page. If you want to omit facts to give yourself national pride or something good on you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by216.52.54.253 (talk) 14:14, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

National pride has nothing to do with it, I'm not american. You edited and added uncited and otherwise dubious information, it was reverted, you then re-reverted it without realising that perhaps you are in the wrong. Friendly advice, in future if you edit something stop and think as to whether or not you may need to cite it. Take it or leave it. KiraChinmoku _{(T, ¤)} 14:18, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:UAA

Thanks for reporting username violations at WP:UAA! Just a friendly reminder that new entries go at the top of the list :)Singularity42 (talk) 14:47, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I use huggle and it likes putting them at the bottom haha! KiraChinmoku _(T,¤) 14:48, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Really? That's unfortunate. I've left a change request at Wikipedia:Huggle/Feedback#WP:UAA entries.Singularity42 (talk) 14:55, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah nice one, was looking for where to make a comment on that. I'm pretty sure it does the same for AIV reports too, though I've never checked specifically. KiraChinmoku _{(T, ¤)} 14:57, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

This is a really minor issue, and I don't want you to stress over it, but I'm a bit concerned about the markup length of your signature. I was a bit surprised at the markup length when I went to reply to your messages (especially given that the appearance length is so small). The markup length would be frowned up upon by guidelines for signature length. When you have some time, do you mind taking a look at that? Thanks. Singularity42 (talk) 15:00, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yep no problem. I've had that sig for so long, its probably about time it was changed anyway! Thanks for the heads upKiraChinmoku _{(T, ¤)} 15:02, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained page blanking

You [1] Jpendergraph (talk · contribs) when xe blanked Computer Simulated Universes Evolutionary Hypothesis. Since Jpendergraph is the only author to have made any substantial edits to this page, can we not interpret this page blanking as an implicit request to delete (per WP:CSD#G7)? WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:34, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah thats fair enough, though it did already have a proposed deletion template anyway KiraChinmoku 15:36, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

i wanted to remove the unwanted links of references which is not in the current page.I don't know how to do that. its appearing at the end of the page — Preceding unsigned comment added byBlackwizard2000 (talk • contribs) 17:32, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Los Finales no son como tu lo ESCRIBES

Mira me di cuenta espero que seas tu que has estado cambiando de PRESENT y ya estas poniendo las supuestas fechas de finales en novelas como LA TEMPESTAD, MENTIR PARA VIVIR, CORAZON INDOMABLE...ETC. Lo que no es asi...ya que en algunas paises no pueden transmitir un capitulo ya sea que transmitan un partido de su seleccion o den un megaproyecto. Al grano, en Panama la fecha del final de LA TEMPESTAD no es esas ya que en una semana solo dieron 2 capitulos de la telenovela y no es justo que yo arreglo y tu lo cambies, TE MOLESTA DEJARLOS EN "PRESENT". — Precedingunsigned comment added by 190.34.108.172 (talk) 01:23, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Promoting

That section is full of promoting mohanlal that he played central character without any source — Preceding unsigned comment added by111.92.14.165 (talk) 09:54, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to Saint-Lambert sur Dives

Hi, I've noticed that one can't just make changes without explanation to Wikipedia pages ! Sorry about that, I didn't realise... The change I made concerns the Falaise pocket battle of 1944 in Saint Lambert sur Dive in the Orne deparment of France. In the English Wikipedia the battle is stated as taking place in Saint-Lambert in the Calvados department about 35 miles to west. This is incorrect. It took place in the village of Saint Lambert SUR DIVE in the Orne department. The mistake is understandable after all, 2 villages called Saint Lambert 35 miles apart :). To check this just look up Saint-Lambert, Calvados in the English Wikipedia and click on the French link. You'll find that there is no reference to the battle in the French Wikipedia. Then do the same for Saint-Lambert sur Dive and you'l find an interesting summary on the French page. Regards Richard

Hi Richard, that's fine. In future make sure you add citations and edit summaries. That way users like myself won't immediately assume your edits are vandalism or something like that. Regards KiraChinmoku 09:18, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wilfried Martens

Hello Kirachinmoku

Source is added in the next edit (language: Dutch)

@81.82.220.86:, thats fine, thanks very much! KiraChinmoku 06:51, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

M1 120mm Stratosphere gun

information on M1 120mm Stratosphere gun that was removed vandal/dubious info was obtained from the book On Air Defense by James D.Crabtree,1994 ISBN 0275949397,Chapter 9 United States,pgs-120-129. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.177.85.248 (talk) 20:05, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@67.177.85.248: - You need to add that as a citation when you add the information. Feel free to revert my edit in order to add that in! The issues was less that it was dubious and more it was uncited and therfore un-proven. Many thanksKiraChinmoku 20:09, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delvin Hughley page

How long does the speedy deletion process take? My personal life is being exposed and I hope the page can be deleted ASAP. ThanksDelvin5 (talk) 21:25, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Huggle help

Hi!

I need help configuring Huggle.

Every time I try to sign in, it asks to check the configuration page. I received the rollback right recently and was trying to make use of Huggle, but in vain. Please let me know of the configuration procedure... Thanks in advance! Martinian ^{Leave a message!} 20:38, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@In Transit: - Hiya, its quite some time since I actually originally set it up! To the best of my knowledge the config stuff should check if it already exists and if not create it all with the defaults. Failing that, take a look here[2] and follow all the steps. Sorry i can't be more help!KiraChinmoku 20:40, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Instructions on that link worked :) ... Thanks a lot!!! Martinian ^{Leave a message!} 20:54, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New Message

Hi, The reference says 2.46. --Connie (A.K) (talk) 20:43, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@La Avatar Korra: - The reference clearly states 2.467 which rounded correctly to 2 decimal places is 2.47 KiraChinmoku 20:46, 11 October 2013 (UTC

Aha, sorry an thanks. ;). --Connie (A.K) (talk) 20:52, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I did not know. Sorry. --Connie (A.K) (talk) 20:54, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Return of a problem

Hello Kirachinmoku. I noticed that you've placed some warnings on IP 90.200.85.80 (talk · contribs) page. I just thought I would let you know that this is the return of our Burton-on-Trent vandal. Here are the previous SPIs Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/90.200.85.232/Archive. I thought I thought I would leave these links in case they might be of use. Thanks for your vigilance in taking care of Wikipedia's articles. Cheers. MarnetteD | Talk 18:04, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@MarnetteD: - Hiya, thanks for bringing that to my attention, is that IP being investigated as yet? KiraChinmoku 08:13, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so. My onWiki time is limited at the moment so I don't always have a chance to check on things. This editor seems to edit in bursts and then disappear so not every IP gets reported to SPI. That is one reason that I started the page to track the IPs. Please feel free to add to it should you come upon this editor again. Regards. MarnetteD | Talk 17:56, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@MarnetteD: - I've flagged this up in SPI now. See here [3] - Regards KiraChinmoku 19:42, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

For a bit older history (and more IPs), see this thread I made at User:Rodhullandemu/Archive/34#The_90.199.99..2A_IP 3 years ago. The person/IPs has actually been at it for 5 years now. I dealt with the user myself from 2008 to 2011. Nymf (talk) 19:56, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the link Nymf. Please see the post by Bishonen here Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive815#Disruptive IP who was blocked two days ago is back. Looks like we can report any new IPs directly to that admin. Regards to you both. MarnetteD | Talk 21:04, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@MarnetteD:/@Nymf: - Thanks both for the links. Good stuff, we may actually get this blighter killed off! KiraChinmoku 12:44, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stortford Music Festival concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stortford Music Festival, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:07, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stortford Music Festival

Hello Kirachinmoku. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Stortford Music Festival".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stortford Music Festival}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 13:15, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regrettably I forgot I even started that article, and I don't have to to finish it off. It can be deleted! KiraChinmoku 13:30, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your attention needed at WP:CHU

Hello. A bureaucrat or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. --I am k6ka ^{Talk to me!} _{See what I have done} 14:11, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ITB Alumni

I simply have no idea someone half the globe away from a country can know better that my edit is right or wrong. You twice reverted my edit at this page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bandung_Institute_of_Technology, while what I did was to update the fact that Alwin Syah Loebis is NO longer President Director of Aneka Tambang. Current President Director is Tato Miraza. source: http://www.antam.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9&Itemid=18 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.232.84.229 (talk) 12:38, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This was reverted due to a lack of citations for the change. RobertEves92 15:18, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CVs

The tag to use is G11 - advertising or promotion. You can also use A7 non-notable person in most cases. On a user page, U5 or G11 - but that is for a proper CV not just telling us a bit about who they are. Peridon (talk) 15:50, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aha cool, thanks for the tip! RobertEves92 16:57, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Taylor

I think you must have made a mistake. My edit included a reliable source. I mentioned the existence of a crowd-funded petition, and backed up that claim by providing the primary source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.168.66.228 (talk) 12:25, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The paragraph you added did not have any citations. I believe someone else has messaged you regarding this matter. RobertEves92 15:20, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, sorry, you have made a mistake. The paragraph I added had a citation. And yes, I am currently slogging away at this on the talk page for the article concerned. 86.168.66.228 (talk) 00:23, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mr Blue Skye

Now, why on Earth did you remove the information I added about the baroque part in the song? --213.89.69.174 (talk) 20:12, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Uncited changes. No references or citations to back up the edits you have made. RobertEves92 20:26, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well then - with that point of view I'll remove every part from the article that isn't backed up by refernces or citations. I'll start with the cover verison section shortly.--213.89.69.174 (talk) 00:29, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, RobertEves92. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]