User talk:Robbotis

Possibly unfree Image:Bridge-9a.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Bridge-9a.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 00:29, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your message on Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2007 July 18. Basically we need confirmation that you are the same person who uploaded the file to [1]. Garion96 (talk) 18:57, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Copyright (C) 2007 Robert Sellmeyer

Template:Copyright (C) 2007 Robert Sellmeyer has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — bd2412 T 19:27, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Rakeop2patch.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Rakeop2patch.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:10, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Rakeops

I have nominated Rakeops, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rakeops. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Damiens.rf 03:10, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Rakeops

I have nominated Rakeops, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rakeops. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Damiens.rf 03:12, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Henry Bridge

The article Henry Bridge has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced. No indication of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 21:53, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]