User talk:Roanukz/Neuroscience
This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2013 Q3. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Georgia Institute of Technology/Introduction to Neuroscience (Fall 2013)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
1. Quality of Information: 2
2. Article size: 0
Need 9,000 More bytes.
3. Readability: 1
Language would be difficult to read by laypeople.
4. Refs: 2
Needs to have 10.
5. Links: 1
Only links once to another Wiki page.
6. Responsive to comments: 2
7. Formatting: 1
Does not have course banner tagged
8. Writing: 1
Well written, but largest paragraph was all about one original research (not supposed to have original research).
9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 1
Cannot find real name anywhere.
10. Outstanding?: 0
Needs significant work. _______________ Total: 11 out of 20
Ewatkins8 (talk) 21:59, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Peer Review from Nilton Yanez
[edit]- Quality of Information: 1 (explain more in detail; some of us don't know much about the subject)
- Article size: 0 (under 15 kB)
- Readability: 1 (some people might not understand what you are saying; work a little on that)
- Refs: 1 (more citations needed)
- Links: 1 (not enough links)
- Responsive to comments: 2
- Formatting: 1 (no title; maybe organize the bulleted list in a different way, maybe just make it a heading with a higher level, no banner)
- Writing: 2
- Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2
- Outstanding?: 1 (good, but needs more information; fix the problems)
Total: 12 out of 20
Nyanez1 (talk) 23:13, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your comments, I have updated much of the article content and references, feel free to let me know what you think.
Roanukz (talk) 02:52, 12 December 2013 (UTC)