User talk:Rnueesch

Welcome!

Hello, Rnueesch, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Hubert Österle, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 23:15, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hubert Österle

The article Hubert Österle has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 23:15, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Hubert Oesterle Profile.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Hubert Oesterle Profile.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 19:50, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:HubertOesterle.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:HubertOesterle.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:06, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Electronic Markets (journal)

Could you perhaps explain why you are removing valid (and needed) wikilinks from the lead of this article and replacing the description sourced by the journals own webpage, which clearly states that it covers e-commerce? Also, could you please have a look at WP:BOLDTITLE: The lead should start with the article title in bold (and because it is the name of a journal, also in italics), but the susbtitle of the name is not part of the article title and should therefore be only in italics, not in bold. We also do not include (unnecessary) acronyms, which would be of use only to people who cannot spell or read (and they don't come to WP...)

If you think the journal description can be improved, then please propose an alternative text on the talk page of the article. However, please stop edit warring and discuss what you are trying to do first (see WP:BOLD). I strongly suggest that you revert your last edit. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 17:16, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]