User talk:Rleplin

Calling Huon

Is this where I write you? Thank you SO MUCH for converting my format to a gallery. So all I had to do was get rid of the brackets, and the words File and Thumb? Good grief! (Let me know if this wasn't where I was supposed to write you. I've never Talked before.) Rleplin (talk) 00:35, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You also need the <gallery></gallery> tags to create a gallery.

To make sure another user sees your message you may want to either add a link to their user page (that will notify them) or add a note to their talk pages (User talk:Huon in my case). I do keep an eye on talk pages I've written on, so simply replying here obviously worked too. Huon (talk) 01:31, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Huon

Two questions Huon. 1: Where on your Talk page do I add the note? 2: Everything I've tried has seemed impossibly difficult to do, yet turned out to be incredibly easy. So, is there an easy way to delete a file (image) from Wikimedia Commons? I have three of the same image, and two of another. Thanks! Rleplin (talk) 01:42, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notifications are usually placed at the bottom of the talk page; you can use the "new section" tab at the top of the page to add a new section. The {{talkback|Rleplin}} template is a standardized way to leave such notifications.

Regarding the Commons images, the relevant policy page is Commons:Deletion policy; the Commons offers a "Nominate for deletion" link in the left sidebar of the image pages that will guide you through the process. There's also speedy deletion, which you can request by adding {{speedydelete|Reason}} (with an appropriate reason instead of "Reason", of course) to the image page, but I don't think that's necessary here, and since the image formats differ I'm not even sure it's applicable in the first place. Huon (talk) 02:32, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How does X work?

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

How do I convert the current format for the paintings under "Paintings" into a Gallery? Rleplin (talk) 04:23, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See Help:Gallery. I've done so here to provide an example. Huon (talk) 04:32, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Rleplin, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 02:06, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User: Huon

Although I will continue to tweak it, I'm ready for this article to be incorporated into Wikipedia. What do I have to do? Please and thank you.

I have moved the page to WT:Articles for creation/Emanuel Leplin, the preferred location for drafts, and submitted it for a review. It may have to be edited some more before it can be accepted. For example, the most heavily-used source contains a link to a San Francisco Public Library web page that doesn't even mention Leplin, and for all I can tell the Emanuel Leplin Collection itself is a primary source whereas Wikipedia content should be based on secondary sources. Someone with better access to the sources than me will have to look over the others. Huon (talk) 23:33, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting mistakenly renamed file

I didn't see the "rename" function until after I renamed many images in order to upload them (when the names had already been in use). Should I now use {{duplicate|File:example.jpg}} in order to delete these files, and if so, where do I place it? Thank you.

I don't think those are exact duplicates; for example the colors on File:Tea Garden Bridge.jpg and File:Japanese Tea Garden Bridge.jpg slightly differ (the former looks better to me). Thus {{duplicate}} is not applicable. (If some images indeed are exact duplicates, you can edit the page of the image you want deleted and add {{duplicate|File:Example.jpg}} to the very top, with the name of the correctly named image instead of "Example.jpg".)

I expect you'll have to use a slightly more complicated route. At the Commons, in the left sidebar of the image pages you'll find a "Nominate for deletion" link. You can use that to tag them for deletion one-by-one. You can also bundle the deletion requests (since the rationale will be the same for all of them); see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Mass deletion request on how to do so. Huon (talk) 23:33, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Leplin Collection contains secondary sources

To User:Huon.

Hi Huon. The Emanuel Leplin Collection in the San Francisco History Center <http://sflib1.sfpl.org/record=b2340034~S1> contains physical copies or originals of all of the articles, reviews and programs attributed to it in San Francisco newspapers and Symphony programs. These are secondary sources. I didn't write them, nor did I publish the newspapers and programs in which they appeared. All I did was give physical copies to the History Center.

Currently, the Collection description contains less than half of what the Collection contains. They have not updated their description pending further additions. Rocky Leplin Rleplin (talk) 03:55, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Emanuel Leplin at piano with pipe, 1945.png

Thanks for uploading File:Emanuel Leplin at piano with pipe, 1945.png, which you've attributed to Photo from the family archives. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 02:50, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Emanuel Leplin was accepted

Emanuel Leplin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Zach Vega (talk to me) 22:18, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Calling Huon or another Wikipedian

How do you put images on left side of an article? Thank you. Rleplin (talk) 21:10, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to Jim Woodward re. Emanuel Leplin

Hi Jim,

I am responding to your response to my commentary about the circumstances surrounding the deleted photo File:Emanuel Leplin at piano with pipe, 1945.png. You were generous enough to clarify the Precautionary Principle. Would you please indulge me in a few questions? Can you tell me what is involved in the process of transferring a copyright of something to someone else? What constitutes the "formal agreement" you spoke of? Absent this, how can it ever be possible to prove that someone who is in every likelihood deceased, and when his heirs if any are unknown, transferred rights to a photo? Why isn't the gift of a photograph a transfer of copyright for its use? I have two large photographs of Pierre Monteux, both containing inscriptions celebrating the likelihood of Leplin's future "brilliant carrière." Do I need to find the heirs of Monteux (who know nothing about these photos, one of which is undated and the other dated 1939) to ask them to carry out the formal agreement transferring copyright before I can legally publish them? Or would this be irrelevant, since Monteux himself may never have owned the copyrights?

I have photographs of Emanuel Leplin going back 84 years, and I don't know who took any of them. I gave dozens of photographs of him to his archive the San Francisco History Center at the San Francisco Public Library. I was told that once something is gifted to the History Center, the History Center owns the material. Is this an infringement on a possible but unproven copyright? I have yet to find a biography in Wikipedia that does not have a photo of the subject at the beginning of the article. Can you tell me what I can do to add a photo to the beginning of the Emanuel Leplin article? Having a photo at the beginning of the article might actually make a difference in a prospective conductor's consideration of a performance.

Thank you. Rleplin (talk) 19:49, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How do I insert a 69-year-old photo taken by an anonymous person?

I need to place a photo of Emanuel Leplin at the beginning of his page. I had one that was deleted by James Woodward because I couldn't prove I own the copyright of one which was taken 69 years ago, before I was born. Many photos of Emanuel Leplin taken over many decades were handed down to me, none of which show any indication of who took them. Every biography of a composer or painter (Emanuel Leplin was both) that I've seen has a photo at the beginning, except E. Leplin's. To the best of my knowledge, there are only two places that have photos of E. Leplin: my house, and the San Francisco History Center of the San Francisco Public Library. Can someone please tell me what I can do to represent E. Leplin properly, in the way I've seen every other composer or painter's page enjoys? Thank you. Rleplin (talk) 21:16, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Emanuel Leplin may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:20, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Pierre Monteux may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:02, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Manual of Style

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Toccata quarta (talk) 20:54, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

Just in case you are behind this edit, please see WP:SOCK. Regards, Toccata quarta (talk) 06:28, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Rleplin. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Rleplin. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]