User talk:Rjuner

Edit War over National-Anarchism article

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on National Anarchism. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. SHEFFIELDSTEEL^TALK 16:03, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Improvements to the National-Anarchism article

I edited the National-Anarchism article in light of your comments on the Talk:National-Anarchism page. Let me know what you think. --Loremaster (talk) 17:09, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI re WP:User page

I have,, thrice now,, deleted your userpage because it has been created (as below) by someone other than you. Do you want this to stay, or do you prefer your userpage remain redlinked? –xeno^talk 13:29, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{Boxboxtop|'''User Details'''}}
{{User Wikipedian For|year=2007|month=12|day=06}}
{{User:UBX/male}}
{{user en-5}}
{{Boxboxbottom}}

Thanks, I do not care either way. Rjuner (talk) 20:38, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Hello Mr. Yeoman. Could you please contact Troy Southgate to ask him to to review the current version of the National-Anarchism article? --Loremaster (talk) 14:56, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Yeoman, I've done a significant update of the article. Your opinion, whether it is positive or negative, would be appreciated. --Loremaster (talk) 00:16, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Attention Rjuner / Andrew Yeoman

The notice at the top of the Talk:National-Anarchism page indicates that National-Anarchism is a controversial topic which is often in dispute. So please discuss substantial changes on the talk page before making them. That being said, as a leader in the National-Anarchist movement, you have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to how the National-Anarchism article presents the definition, history, views, political positioning and criticisms of your movement. When I look at your recent edits, the majority of them seem to try to whitewash the racialist dimension of National-Anarchism and suppress some sourced criticisms in order to make your movement more attractive or less controversial. This is simply unacceptable. I therefore suggest you refrain from editing the article yourself and limit yourself to voicing your concerns on its talk page. If you choose to disregard my polite request, I will have to report you to a Wikipedia administrator. --Loremaster (talk) 16:07, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Rjuner and National-Anarchism article

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Loremaster (talk) 22:19, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]