User talk:Rjm656s

Worksop

Why were the edits made to Worksop ? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.71.153.235 (talk • contribs) .

It appeared to be vandalism to me. If it was not then I apologize and encourage you to make your edit a bit less POV and a bit more encyclopedic. Rjm656s 03:20, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your VandalProof Application

Dear Rjm656s,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact with the new 1.1 version release it has even more power. As such we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that you have not quite met our 250 mainspace edit minumum (although you are getting close). I'd also like to see you warn users after you have reverted their edits as vandalism (which you don't appear to do) to ensure you have a grip on the test templates.. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again in the not too distant future. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. - Gl e n ^T_C (Stollery) 02:59, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof!

Hi Rjm656s, thank you for your interest in VandalProof and Congratulations! You are now one of our authorized users, so if you haven't already simply download VandalProof from our main page, install and you're ready to go!

If you have any problems please feel free to contact me or post a message on VandalProof's talk page. Once again congrats and welcome to our team! - Gl e n ^T_C (Stollery) 05:56, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nicely done BTW :) - Gl e n ^T_C (Stollery) 05:56, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Sorry

Sorry that was copyrighted. I am new to wiki and dont know that much but hey I'm still learning. I guese ill rewrite it, or is it okay to put it in quotes? Jordan199311 15:50, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

194.73.114.110

This user has now been blocked for one week, as per your comments on WP:AIV. (aeropagitica) (talk) 14:17, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Remember the Titans

I am relatively new to wikipedia, and I caught the person originally vandalizing this page, and I notice you keep getting him for vandalizing it, what steps do you take to get his IP blocked? --Sopranosmob781 01:32, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MSU

hey, what year are you over at MSU --Ancientanubis 01:47, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Anon vandal

I don't think I should raise the block -- it's "only" the user's second block. The punishment fits the crime. If the vandalism was just a slur of curse words, I'd consider raising the block. Any further questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka Talk to me! 17:01, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bobak

Fair enough about the warning, have taken out the more blaring sarcasm despite Bobak's comically arrogant condescending pedantry and OTT censorship (if he objected to trivia edit he might have just deleted it and started a discussion) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Peteranthony (talk • contribs) .

Sheesh

Ok, I know this guy in real life, can't I joke around with him? Sheesh! --kizzle 04:15, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) --kizzle 04:16, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

F**king

is not much of an edit. Anyone can know. We don't want otters to accidentalliy see a curse weord. Bona Fides 20:54, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Rjm656s. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]