User talk:Rizvirizvi

Welcome!

Hello, Rizvirizvi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Hadith on sadaqah, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Bihco (talk) 06:19, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hadith on sadaqah

The article Hadith on sadaqah has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Duplicate of Sadaqah

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bihco (talk) 06:19, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Termagant. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed even if some believe it to be contentious. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. You also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. Your mismotivated deletion of a quotation from the 12th-century Chanson de Roland has been reverted. Please view the article Chanson de Roland.--Wetman (talk) 22:20, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Islamic articles

Could you please take the time to read Wikipedia:Manual of Style (Islam-related articles). If you look here you can see that the problem is with adding things like "prophet" and honorific's which have to be removed. Thanks. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 18:59, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I just reverted your edit to Qur'an since it came across as proselytizing, in violation of WP:MOSISLAM. Encyclopedia articles should convey information about the subject, not preach. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:28, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also please don't add things to the "see also" section if they are already in the article. Thanks. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 04:36, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Using honorifics includes adding صلى الله عايه و سلم Please stop. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 04:44, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And also stop using an IP to make your edits. Thanks. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 17:08, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Qur'an, you may be blocked from editing. If you want your changes to go into the article, discuss them on the article talk page, and learn the Wikipedia guidelines, particularly WP:MOSISLAM. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:04, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. bodnotbod (talk) 00:05, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Qur'an, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please propose your changes, and the rationale for including them, on the appropriate article talk pages. Thanks. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:45, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Repeated Vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. FASTILY ^(TALK) 06:27, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]