User talk:Rivivar1234

Rivivar1234, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Rivivar1234! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:41, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

I see that you attempted to move a page to User:CustomerXPs Software Pvt. Ltd. However, there is no such user as "CustomerXPs Software Pvt. Ltd", so there is no case for creating a user page under that title. Perhaps you meant to move it to CustomerXPs Software Pvt. Ltd. If so, apart from the questionability of moving a page from another editor's userspace, there is also the fact that the page, although considerably toned down from early drafts, is still somewhat promotional, and it is doubtful whether it is suitable as an article. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:43, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Since writing the message above, I have seen more of the history of your editing, and of the editing of the user account Jitheshcxps. I have discovered, amongst other things:

The account Jitheshcxps not only had a history of attempting to use Wikipedia as a free advertising service, and even stated that his or her intention was to do so. ("Since we are a private company and a small one at that, we are trying to get credible visibility via channels like Wikipedia especially from a recruitment perspective since we're hiring quite aggressively this year.")
The page you tried to move was a re-creation of a page that had been deleted as a result of unambiguous consensus at a deletion discussion. Attempting to unilaterally overturn consensus by ignoring it and re-creating a deleted page is disruptive and unacceptable.
The account Rivivar1234 has also been used for the creation of unambiguously promotional material for the same business as Jitheshcxps, and that material has been deleted.

It is essential that you, and anybody else who may consider trying to use Wikipedia to promote or publicise your business, grasp the following point. Wikipedia is not a medium for promotion of anything. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:05, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Rivivar1234/sandbox (January 17)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to read the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit when you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at User:Rivivar1234/sandbox.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 12:12, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Customerxps Software Pvt. Ltd. (February 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Customerxps Software Pvt. Ltd..
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Anupmehra -Let's talk! 14:50, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Customerxps Software Pvt. Ltd. (March 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Customerxps Software Pvt. Ltd..
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SarahStierch (talk) 19:03, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Customerxps Software Pvt. Ltd. was accepted

Customerxps Software Pvt. Ltd., which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CorporateM (Talk) 23:17, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Rivivar1234/sandbox

Hello Rivivar1234. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "sandbox".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|User:Rivivar1234/sandbox}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 14:41, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating Wikipedia's terms of use by engaging in undisclosed paid editing and using Wikipedia for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rivivar1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a paid employee for the company and new to editing Wikipedia. I am sorry for not disclosing the employment as I didn't know I was supposed to disclose the employment. [1]

Decline reason:

Thanks. That isn't sufficient, of course. Even with paid disclosure, your contributions were completely inappropriate. You will not be unblocked to write about that company, or about anything else for which you have a conflict of interest. Yamla (talk) 13:12, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rivivar1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please highlight any content that is promotional and we will review it. All content mentioned on the page have the relevant syndicated 3rd party content links. Regarding the user account - I, being the CEO of the company and a salaried employee, have not been exclusively paid to create content for our company page. Request you to unblock basis that we are doing this as our own independent initiative. Rivivar1234 (talk) 05:59, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are a paid editor and must comply with WP:PAID. If you are the CEO, ultimately everything that occurs in the company is your responsibility. You don't have to be specifically paid to edit Wikipedia. As Yamla noted, your contributions were wholly inappropriate and will not be permitted to continue. If you are only interested in editing about your company, you will not be unblocked. If you want to be a general Wikipedia contributor and edit about subjects not related to your conflict of interest, you may make another request and state what subjects those might be along with specifically agreeing to not edit in the areas of your conflict of interest. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:43, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rivivar1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thank you 331dot for clarifying. I would like to state that there seems to have been an unintentional conflict of interest while updating the stub[1], resulting in an inadvertent violation of Wikipedia policy / guidelines on paid contribution undisclosed paid editing. I am currently in the best position to update the stub[2] given my knowledge about this particular company. As regards contributing to other Wikipedia pages, I would like to contribute to pages on artificial intelligence and machine learning in fintech. Rivivar1234 (talk) 11:44, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

WP:NOTGETTINGIT -- Scott (talk) 04:58, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

"I am currently in the best position to update the stub given my knowledge about this particular company." No. No no no. WP:COI, WP:PAID. You are literally in the worst position to update the stub, as we've told you over and over again. Talk page access revoked due to WP:IDHT. --Yamla (talk) 14:04, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-Administrator-Comment) No, No, No, No. Thats not yust a policy, that you need to declare any paid edits. That ist Section 4 of the Terms of Use of Wikipedia. So you barely violate the terms of use, which means that we can block you at any time. Further, it means, that if you dont provide a very good reason how you will continiue editing, as above, then there is no reason for unblocking you. Victor Schmidt (talk) 19:08, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]