User talk:Riversinhereyes

Welcome!

Hello, Riversinhereyes, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Rossami (talk) 20:48, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/skins-1.5/common/images/button_image.png re: your Content Review request

Greetings I have been working with Thadman Steve C. on this case. He suggested, after my presenting him my information, that I request a deletion review. Shall I repost everything i sent in that request? It was in the AMA request for assistance page.

So. I don't know what exactly to do next, but i will revisit the DRV page. ANd try again.

yes this is about Antoinette Nora Claypoole, though in publishing i never use capital letters. thus my name antoinette nora claypoole.

thank you antoinette.

You requested a review of the deletion of the entry for "antoinette nora claypoole". Please note that Wikipedia article titles are case sensitive so please help me if this is referring to a different article. Antoinette Nora Claypoole was deleted on 11 Aug 2006 as a result of this discussion. It was speedy-deleted on 20 Aug as "re-posted content". Several associated redirects were deleted at the same time.

The "Content Review" section of Wikipedia:Deletion review is for the temporary restoration of an article for a specific purpose. From your comment, it appears that you want to open a full review of the deletion decision. The instructions for that are further down on the page. I will format that request for you on the DRV page but you will have to quickly show up to that page to provide your reason for requesting the review and your explanation of what you believe went wrong in the deletion discussion. Either provide new evidence which was not available during the deletion discussion or provide references to policy showing where the process failed in this case. Rossami (talk) 21:01, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]