User talk:Riverarvi

Phil Younghusband

Do you not have any better quality images of Phil Younghusband? The photo in the infobox, you can barely see his face. The photo of him playing the cup final, same as the one in the infobox and it just doesn't look like a great pic either. The photo of him in a practice match is blurred, its the same for the other photos as well. Because of that, it makes it a bit useless to add. Banana Fingers (talk) 14:45, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

For security reasons, I usually don't bring my DSLR to UFL matches. I took these pictures using a my Nokia's camera, so please forgive the rather blurry nature of the images. I'll try to bring my Canon DSLR when the 1st division of the UFL resumes after the Challenge Cup. Again, sorry for the low quality, but at least the players' articles have faces for now.

Like I said, you can't really see his face in two of the three photos. So it's a bit ironic that last sentence. hehe. Banana Fingers (talk) 22:58, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miriam Coronel-Ferrer has been accepted

Miriam Coronel-Ferrer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Oo7565 (talk) 07:25, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gerphil Flores (July 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gerphil Flores and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 00:53, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello! Riverarvi, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 00:53, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Gerphil Flores concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Gerphil Flores, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Gerphil Flores

Hello, Riverarvi. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Gerphil Flores".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 19:26, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Seal of the Office of the Solicitor General of the Philippines.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Seal of the Office of the Solicitor General of the Philippines.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

November 2017

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Legal separation. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:16, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Riverarvi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:DreamLeagueSoccer1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DreamLeagueSoccer1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Philippine Aerospace Development Corporation.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Philippine Aerospace Development Corporation.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:49, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of University of the Philippines Diliman

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article University of the Philippines Diliman you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ed! -- Ed! (talk) 03:00, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Hello. Sorry to say this one has a ways to go, but would be happy to work with you to build it to a place where it is ready to be nominated again. Please see the nomination page for more details. —Ed!^(talk) 03:31, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of University of the Philippines

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article University of the Philippines you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ed! -- Ed! (talk) 03:40, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of University of the Philippines Diliman

The article University of the Philippines Diliman you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:University of the Philippines Diliman for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ed! -- Ed! (talk) 03:41, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of University of the Philippines

The article University of the Philippines you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:University of the Philippines for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ed! -- Ed! (talk) 04:40, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of University of the Philippines

The article University of the Philippines you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:University of the Philippines for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ed! -- Ed! (talk) 01:41, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Seal of the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG) of the Philippines.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Seal of the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG) of the Philippines.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maya-1 (satellite), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Department of Science and Technology (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Riverarvi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)