Jump to content

User talk:Riteze

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Although some prefer welcoming newcomers with cookies, I find fruit to be a healthier alternative.

Hello, Riteze, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.



Why can't I edit some particular pages?
Some pages that have been vandalized repeatedly are semi-protected, meaning that editing by new or unregistered users is prohibited through technical measures. If you have an account that is four days old and has made at least 10 edits, then you can bypass semi-protection and edit any semi-protected page. Some pages, such as highly visible templates, are fully-protected, meaning that only administrators can edit them. If this is not the case, you may have been blocked or your IP address caught up in a range block.
Where can I experiment with editing Wikipedia?
Use the main sandbox or create your own personal sandbox to experiment.
How do I create an article?
See how to create your first article, then use the Article Wizard to create one, and add references to the article as explained below.
How do I create citations?
  1. Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
  2. Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
  3. In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
  4. Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
  5. Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like <ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>, copy the whole thing).
  6. In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
  7. If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:
==References==
{{Reflist}}
What is a WikiProject, and how do I join one?
A WikiProject is a group of editors that are interested in improving the coverage of certain topics on Wikipedia. (See this page for a complete list of WikiProjects.) If you would like to help, add your username to the list that is on the bottom of the WikiProject page.

August 2024

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Constitution of India, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — DaxServer (t·m·e·c) 15:08, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

[edit]

Information icon Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Draupadi. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:43, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop vandalising articles

[edit]

Stop vandalising articles with your POV edits as did you to Rama, Hanuman and Kusha (Ramayana). I and many others have already told you that mythology doesn't need to tick the checklist of the rules of science neither it cares about what you think. Information which is clearly stated in the texts and is obvious doesn't need citations but your nonsense claims and POVs do. Now don't change any information without reliable sources and also don't ask citations for the information which is clearly mentioned in the texts just because it doesn't fit right with your nonsense POV. Hbanm (talk) 15:42, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hbanm If it is clearly mentioned in those texts, please cite those texts. No POV or any rules of any subject are being pushed. Only compliance with Wikipedia's policy that is WP:RS is being asked for. Riteze (talk) 15:46, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I already told you things which are clearly mentioned in the texts doesn't necessarily need citations, your nonsense claims do. Don't change original information until you have reliable sources for your nonsense claims. Hbanm (talk) 15:52, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Hbanm There are no claims from my side, but only the request for reliable sources for the existing content. And which "texts" are you talking about? Riteze (talk) 16:09, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have added citation for Kusha (Ramayana), things which are clearly mentioned in orginal texts doesn't necessarily need citations and if you need them so bad, add them yourself instead of asking for them on every article or changing the information according to your POV Hbanm (talk) 16:14, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Learn how to read English

[edit]

That thing you mentioned in the article Kusha (Ramayana) is not for Lava and Kusha not being sons of Rama, but it is for all the war that took place. Learn english first. Now if you vandalise original information on any article one more time according to your nonsense POV and without any reliable sources you will be reported to administrators for being "vandalism only" account. Hbanm (talk) 04:36, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hbanm It is you who is vandalizing the articles by repeatedly deleting the cited portions of the texts. You have not read the english correctly, probably due to your biased mindset. Please see carefully, the "story" word is written in the sentence which you are referring to, and "son, father etc." is not written.
And please don't jump on to reverting anyone's edits, specially the cited ones, before discussing it.
On this context, please undo the last change made by you in the said article. Riteze (talk) 04:53, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes that is for the war story which is told, now you understand? If it was for Lava and Kusha for not being sons of Rama, it would have been written in the start where it is mentioned that they both are sons of Rama. Like this "Lava and Kusha are sons of Rama according to some minor texts but they are not mentioned in the Valmiki Ramayana". If you want to insert your POV bring the reliable source wherein it is clearly written that "Lava and Kusha are not mentioned in the Valmiki Ramayana". Don't try to sneak in your POV behind your misinterpreted understanding of the citation. Hbanm (talk) 05:11, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Hbanm I never said that Lava and Kusha are not mentioned in the Valmiki Ramayana. It is about their story only. The edit in question also mentioned the same thing about story only, nothing about their existence or parentage. Thus, the last version (before reversion) was not incorrect in this sense.
Readers must be aware that the story of war doesn't exist in the Valmiki Ramayana. Therefore, the last version may please be restored by undoing the last reversion. Riteze (talk) 08:08, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You consider yourself as extremely clever and other people as fools, right? You clearly stated that their "story" is not mentioned in the Ramayana in your edit only to push your stupid POV, but the truth is their "story" is mentioned in the Uttarakhand of Ramayana. There is no mention of any war story in the lead that you are mentioning that this story is not present in Valmiki Ramayana. Regarding the war story in the citation which you are using to push your POV is already mentioned in the article as non-authentic or occuring only in some versions. Hbanm (talk) 08:28, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Hbanm I left my so called POV, as soon as I found the citation added to the first line. I just wanted to make minimal changes in the existing content to keep the lead as short as possible, since one line of information on someone's birth may not be considered as a story by many. I will undo my edit, even though not necessary. Riteze (talk) 08:34, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kusha (Ramayana), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Athithi. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Riteze&oldid=1252419968"