User talk:Ritarko2015

Welcome!

Hello, Ritarko2015! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! —MRD2014 (formerly Qpalzmmzlapq) T C 19:54, 8 May 2016 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts Disambiguation link notification for August 28 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. Na Jene Mon (Film) added links pointing to Cinema, Kingdom, Story, Features and Bengali It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 28 August 2016 (UTC) Overcapitalised and overlinked Hi, thanks for your work. PLEASE don't capitalise everything, and don't link common words. Tony (talk) 09:57, 3 December 2016 (UTC) December 2016 Hello, I'm WaffleMaster44. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Sudeep Ranjan Sarkar have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. WaffleMaster44 (talk) 21:21, 7 December 2016 (UTC) Wikipedia and copyright Hello Ritarko2015, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Baghini (2016 film) has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here. You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here. Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research. Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste. If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow. Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:16, 9 December 2016 (UTC) December 2016 Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this: Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes) Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history. Edit summary content is visible in: User contributions Recent changes Watchlists Revision differences IRC channels Related changes New pages list Article editing history Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! 220 of Borg 00:44, 29 December 2016 (UTC) Managing a conflict of interest Hello, Ritarko2015. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Rita Jhawar, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please: avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products; instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template); when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE); avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM); exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies. In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID). Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Winged Blades Godric 06:01, 25 June 2017 (UTC) June 2017 Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Winged Blades Godric 06:02, 25 June 2017 (UTC) ArbCom 2017 election voter message Hello, Ritarko2015. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Film Paradiso (February 20) Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gene93k was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Film Paradiso and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Film Paradiso, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save. If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors. • Gene93k (talk) 07:37, 20 February 2018 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Lust a cinema 2018 (April 14) Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lust a cinema 2018 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lust a cinema 2018, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit. If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors. EROS message 03:13, 14 April 2018 (UTC) Hello, Ritarko2015! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EROS message 03:13, 14 April 2018 (UTC) Your submission and about sourcing Greetings. The sole reason for your declination was your sources. In your long list of references, some are alright but most are not. Source #1, Times of India is a good sources and source of such quality should be cited more. However, there are some references which are not reliable, especially #17. For reliable sourcing, you should go for: major newspaper, a factual, widely-published book, high-quality generally trusted mainstream publications. Not blogs, MySpace, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, fansites, Twitter, wikis, or other sites with user-generated content. I've also seen twitter and insta sources posted on my talkpage by you regarding this submission. Read: WP:RS Another dire situation would be that most of your sources are the same. They are routine publishing, sources you give are different websites but their article and content are the same. Please do not spam the references. Instead, try to look for quality sources from or of prestigious Indian names like Times of India, Deccan Chronicle and etc. For your "Official selection" section, your sources didn't mentioned the phrase Marché du Film at all. Or perhaps you would like to change it to 71st Cannes Film Festival ? To avoid the confusion that is. Now, about sourcing, it is best for references to have significant coverage about the subject. Not passing mentions, not directory listings, not just any old thing that happens to have the name in it. Secondly, nothing written by the subject, paid for by the subject, or affiliated with the subject are considered reliable sources. Not their website, and not a press release. The sources must be independent. Do improve on your sourcing as this movie is a notable subject. If you have anymore questions, ping me or post it at the AfC Helpdesk, cheers. EROS message 11:08, 14 April 2018 (UTC) Another thing, please do not insert user-generated content. This also includes Wikipedia itself. Wikipedia is edited by editors like you and me. Hence, it is user-generated as well. EROS message 07:11, 15 April 2018 (UTC) Reply Greetings. About your question of why some articles do not have sources, please read: WP:OTHERSTUFF. Some new editors fail to insert quality sources and some did not cite any at all. Just because one poor article exists doesn't mean we should create a new one; poor articles should either be fixed or deleted. The need to cite such quality sources and go through such stringent procedures is to ensure that the quality of Wikipedia is in no way jeopardised or compromised. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia. It is the duty of editors to give correct and reliable information to those out there, and to uphold the standards of Wikipedia. Nevertheless, I have tagged the articles for deletion. 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kichu_Na_Bola_Kotha, 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rana_Mazumder Cheers and may you explore and get use to Wikipedia. Have fun editing. EROS message 11:43, 16 April 2018 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Lust a cinema 2018 (April 17) Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lust a cinema 2018 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lust a cinema 2018, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit. If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors. Legacypac (talk) 19:21, 17 April 2018 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for April 23 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sudeep Ranjan Sarkar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 23 April 2018 (UTC) AfC notification: Draft:Paradiso has a new comment I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Paradiso. Thanks! Atlantic306 (talk) 18:46, 2 August 2018 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Baghini (upcoming film) The article Baghini (upcoming film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources and no evidence of satisfying WP:NFF. While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS (talk|c|em) 08:01, 29 August 2018 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Neti Neti (film) The article Neti Neti (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: There is no significant coverage in reliable sources and no evidence of satisfying WP:NFILM. Awards are not notable and most of them are completely unsourced and unverifiable. While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS (talk|c|em) 09:08, 29 August 2018 (UTC) Nomination of Sudeep Ranjan Sarkar for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sudeep Ranjan Sarkar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sudeep Ranjan Sarkar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GSS (talk|c|em) 12:09, 6 September 2018 (UTC) {{subst:proposed deletion notify|1=Langto|concern=No significant coverage in reliable sources and no evidence of satisfying [[WP:NFILM]. }} GSS (talk|c|em) 12:16, 6 September 2018 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Na Jene Mon The article Na Jene Mon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: No significant coverage in reliable sources and no evidence of satisfying WP:NFILM. While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS (talk|c|em) 12:19, 6 September 2018 (UTC) Managing a conflict of interest Hello, Ritarko2015. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you: avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors; propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template); disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE); avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM); do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies. In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID). Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. GSS (talk|c|em) 14:15, 6 September 2018 (UTC) Your draft article, Draft:Paradiso Hello, Ritarko2015. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Paradiso". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code. If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CalOtter (talk) 00:44, 1 April 2019 (UTC) Concern regarding Draft:Lust a cinema 2018 Hello, Ritarko2015. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lust a cinema 2018, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 1 April 2021 (UTC) Your draft article, Draft:Lust a cinema 2018 Hello, Ritarko2015. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lust a cinema 2018". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code. If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CommanderWaterford (talk) 21:47, 30 April 2021 (UTC) "Lust (upcoming film)" listed at Redirects for discussion The redirect Lust (upcoming film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 6 § Lust (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 00:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC) Nomination of Lust (upcoming film) for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lust (upcoming film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lust (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:27, 21 November 2023 (UTC)