User talk:Riosk69
August 2018
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Soul music has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Soul music was changed by Riosk69 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95728 on 2018-08-18T03:53:50+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:53, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Riosk69, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Riosk69! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 18 August 2018 (UTC) |
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ekta Kapoor. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 02:36, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Ekta Kapoor. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. 49.148.231.208 (talk) 00:03, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ekta Kapoor. 49.148.224.131 (talk) 04:03, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
August 2018
[edit]Your recent editing history at Ekta Kapoor shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ifnord (talk) 04:29, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 04:49, 22 August 2018 (UTC)- Come on, seriously, what were you thinking with these line of edits? I, at first, I was going to ask and see if a permanent block was too harsh, as most of your edits prior to this were more good-faith mistakes or being too hasty than bad-faith mistakes, but this stuff is inexcusable. Sergecross73 msg me 15:01, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
- Apologize @Sergecross73:, I was not having a mood yesterday so that's why I started by vandalizing a one person's article, but will appeal soon if im ready to edit wikipedia again, Thanks for helping about our aggrement about lucina. Riosk69 (talk) 23:48, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
- I mean @Sergecross73:, The article that I talked about is probably good in shape, I've seen some characters some article characters that contains only 12 sources but meets notability and a few sources that are good article like Li Long, publishing it will be better because there will be people editing and helping to improve it, because I think you're too busy to built it up.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:14, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Orphaned non-free image File:Great Tiger (character).jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Great Tiger (character).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}