User talk:Ringleader77

Tone neutrality on Jim Sikora article

I wanted to reach out as we seem to have differing opinions on how to handle the article about Jim Sikora. I would like to assure you that my edits are not vindictive but good faith efforts to ensure the factual accuracy and neutral point of view of all Wikipedia content. You've reverted my edits saying that they I am removing verifiably true information, but none of the information I have removed has ever been verified through citations. Additionally, in my last edit you can see that I added verified information that I found in reviewing the citations. I believe my edits improve the overall neutral tone of the article, per WP:NPOV and highlight opportunities to verify claims rather than indiscriminately removing it per WP:BLP. I would love to discuss what specific changes I've made that you object to, but if you continue to revert my edits without addressing any of the concerns, we should request a third opinion.

Vegantics (talk) 15:46, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edited to add: I have summarized this information on Talk:Jim Sikora as that seems to be the more appropriate place to discuss this so that other editors may weigh in.