User talk:Rin stephen
|
Possibly unfree File:Miss Vietnam 2008.jpg
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Miss Vietnam 2008.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --J Milburn (talk) 10:02, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Falsely licensed images
[edit]Inserting other people's work into Wikipedia without permission or attribution is unacceptable. Copyright infringement and plagiarism pose serious moral, legal, and reputation problems. Remember: Users who upload content (Image:Hoang Yen Vo 1.jpg) with false license declarations ... may be blocked. feydey (talk) 12:06, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
September 2009
[edit]
Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Miss Universe 2010. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Angelo De La Paz (talk) 12:26, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Miss World Vietnamese, you will be blocked from editing.
Angelo De La Paz (talk) 12:28, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
The unnecessary boldfaces (e.g. incorrect style: Argentina to correct style: Argentina) were removed in your edits in the Miss Earth 2009 in lined with Wikipedia MOS:BOLD guidelines; use boldface only in headings, sections/subsections, table headers, definition list, and volume numbers. One of the most common mistakes in most articles in Wikipedia related to beauty pageants (like Miss Universe and Miss World, Miss International, and Miss Earth is the use of boldface when stating the name of participating countries and this is a clear violation with the Wikipedia: Manual of style, which is considered vandalism if one editor would correct it and someone would undo the correction. Please refer to the MOS:BOLD and let me know your feedback.--Richie Campbell (talk) 15:20, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)