Jump to content

User talk:~riley/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3→Archive 5

Welcome

Hi, Riley Huntley. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope you like it here and decide to stick around. If you see something on Wikipedia that you want to change, just press the edit button and change it!

For the basic principles, see the five pillars of Wikipedia. And if you're ready to make some edits, this Wikipedia cheatsheet may come in handy.

Cheers, ChzzBot IV (talk) 08:23, 21 January 2012 (UTC)


Your submission at Articles for creation

I noticed your submission in Articles for creation, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Evans Repeating Rifle. Thanks! It will be reviewed by a volunteer soon.

Before it can be added to Wikipedia, your submission should have references. All articles on Wikipedia should have inline, numbered references after facts, showing the 'reliable source' (a newspaper, book, etc.) where the information can be checked, so that all information is verifiable.

Here's a video tutorial - hit play, then right-click for "full screen".

Here's an example of how to add references:

Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref>

He likes tea.<ref> Smith, John. "[http://foonews.com/Article42 Interview with Chzz]", Foo News, 1 April 2010. Retrieved 2011-05-22. </ref>

== References ==

{{reflist}}

That makes the references automatically display as small numbers[1] which will link to the details in the section titled == References == at the end. You can see that example in action here.

Please add references to your submission, which will be reviewed as soon as possible. See also, Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners. If you need any help, just put {{helpme}} at the end of this page, followed by a question or get into our live help chat chanel at #wikipedia-en-help connect.

Best, ChzzBot IV (talk) 08:23, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

AFC

Evans Repeating Rifle, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

St John Chrysostom view/my bias 13:47, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Re: A barnstar

Hiyas there Riley,
Thanks for the star - i will make sure it gets a nice place in my galaxy. I also had a look at your contributions and i must say - the Evans Repeating Rifle article is very well written for a first (wikipedia) article. I see that you administer several Wikia sites so i am not surprised it looks above average, but with all the rules and guidelines regarding article content over here it is still quite a feat for a first article.
Having said that (And perhaps you already know) - if you ever plan to write a high quality new article such as that one again, you might want to nominate it at WP:DYK. WP:DYK allows editors to nominate a good new page for placement in the "Did you Know" section on the front page, which generally boosts its views quite a bit. And since i see you are into vandalism patrol as well: If you plan to do it more often (And gotten a little more hands-on experience which is required for rollback to be granted) you may be interested in requesting rollback and moving to one of the more "Advanced" vandalism patrol tools such as Huggle or STiki.
Either way, always good to see another vandalism patrol and of course - happy editing :) Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 20:59, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

In response to your feedback

I'm glad that you are Happy. Welcome to Wikipedia!

Jamietw (talk) 15:40, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

 

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For your recent contributions to keep Wiki a good place....you will surely be granted Rollback Rights!.Congrats!.. Srikar Kashyap (talk) 15:43, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, ~riley. You have new messages at Srikarkashyap's talk page.
Message added 15:57, 1 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Srikar Kashyap (talk) 15:57, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Erroneous revert and warning

Hi Riley Huntley; I'm writing regarding two of your recent edits, a reversion and warning: [1], [2]. Perhaps you were not aware that your reversion and subsequent templating of my talk page were made in error. What concerns me is not so much the edits, which are all but inevitable when one is rapidly reverting vandalism, but the failure to acknowledge them. Again, perhaps you weren't aware, but having long enjoyed the use of the rollback function myself, I know that the rapidity of editing fostered by the privilege calls for the responsibility to recognize one's errors, and to make an equally rapid response. Thank you, 99.156.68.128 (talk) 16:26, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Replied on users talk page regarding the error and automated warning.

Re User talk:Jim1138

While my revert to Esau Wood and the warning to may have been unnecessary, a vandalism warning to my talk page was unjustified. You are not going to make any friends doing things like that. You should have asked why I reverted. Jim1138 (talk) 17:47, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Jim, I reverted your edits because the edit you undid made the actual tongue twister too long and incorrect, and as shown here and here it is longer than normal. Those first source and the article are incorrect (and dont have sources of where the verses came from). I e-mailed the editor of the second link asking where they got the tongue twister from and if it is exactly correct.
Why did you revert the anons edit (not that it was correct either)?
-Riley Huntley (talk) 18:48, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Rread the edit summary, I left: "unexplained removal of content". It appeared to be a random text deleting, so I reverted it. I really don't care why or that you reverted my revert. The problem is that you flagged it as vandalism. See Wikipedia:Vandalism. Such an edit was not vandalism by any means. Such misuse of warnings will get you a "Improper use of warning or blocking template" warning. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 19:25, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Sorry for the inconvenience, I plan to rewrite the whole tongue twister as soon as the e-mail is replied to. The edit appeared to be vandalism in my mind as it was incorrect and overused, sorry for the misuse.

-Riley Huntley (talk) 20:18, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Sup Riley! --Im the Rider, and I Say We Go! (talk) 00:47, 2 May 2012 (UTC) -- Hi Riley I'm not familiar with asking/replying on wiki, My edit was not vandalism. I removed an entire 2, bias paragraphs that had nothing to do with Islamic beliefs about false prophets and were written from the complete perspective of the Ahmadiyah faith. Furthermore, the entire thing is written impartially and starts off by saying "despite this, most modern muslim scholars believe..." and then goes on to say something absurd. It had nothing to do with false Prophets, and promoted an Indian prophet that no mainstream branches of Islam acknowledged. It would be like the Mormon Joseph Smith's life story being placed into the "Christian false prophet" section. I don't get why you reverted it, it was not vandalism. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.40.73.26 (talk) 03:42, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Removal of content is considered vandalism, "Ahmadiyya" is an Islam branch/Islamic reformist movement. I personally think that at least some of the information should stay since it states that "Ahmadiyya Muslim Community" believes different, and that it all is cited. The content from the beginning of the edit to the second citation should at least stay (my opinion).
Cheers,
Riley Huntley (talk) 03:57, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Saint Jerome Emiliani Institute

Hi, Riley. I appreciate your anti-vandalism work. I wanted to ask, though, whether you've looked at the history of Saint Jerome Emiliani Institute where you've reverted new users a couple of times now? One of them is User Bearezzan, who created that article last year, and now wants it deleted. Since he's the only contributor of any substantial content ( I did see you found a blog link; thanks for that ) it's possible that it could be speedy-deleted under {{db-author}}. I'm considering doing that, but I asked Bearezzan on his talk page why he wants it deleted - you might like to have a look - and I wanted to ask you your intentions, too. Were you going to take the article under your wing, for example? I know the standards for inclusion of articles about schools were (hotly) debated recently, and my impression was that they changed, although I don't know how, exactly.

I don't think it would be a bad thing to nominate it for speedy deletion. Even if it can't be speedied, the admin who makes that decision might PROD it, or choose to finish the abortive AfD nom that Bearezzan attempted, but did not complete, or decide that it fails some new criteria for inclusion of school articles, or that it doesn't fail. Basically, I think it'd be helpful for someone more familiar than I am with the new standard for inclusion to have a look, and attracting admin attention via a speedy nom seems a reasonable way to go about that. What do you think? Best,  – OhioStandard (talk) 04:35, 2 May 2012 (UTC)    No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here.

I already knew that "Bearezzan" was the created of the page, I am fine with it being deleted but I would just like it done properly. If asked though, I would take the article under my wing.
Cheers, Mate!
Riley Huntley (talk) 04:42, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Look at you, with your fancy decorations to my talk page! Thanks!
I think I see what's going on. Sjei (talk · contribs) presumably stands for "Saint Jerome Emiliani Institute". That user has now recreated the article as St. Jerome Emiliani Institute, just a newbie's attempt to implement a move, as it appears. Good intentions, obviously, although they could use some hand-holding, re the account name as a violation of our usernames policy, conflict of interest guidelines, & etc. To be frank, I'm not inclined to kick up any dust over the COI; who else but someone associated with a school is going to create such an article?
I think the best plan probably would be to speedy the "old" ( Saint Jerome ) article, and to make sure the admin who reviews the request is aware of the details by posting to the old article's talk page to explain. Does that seem reasonable? And in the interval, if you have the time, you might like to post a {{w-graphical}} welcome to Sjei's page, suggest the help desk, & etc. I'm up against a deadline on something else, or I'd offer to guide Sjei along myself, clean up his or her new article re any wp:peacock language that crops in, that kind of thing. I did make one quick correction to the new article, which really made me smile: St. Jerome wasn't much in favor of thrusting, whether for educational purposes or any other, I believe. ;-) Let me know what you think; I will take the time to speedy the old one, and compose a note to the reviewing admin if you agree. Probably should have a redirect from the old name to the new, as well, of course. Cheers,  – OhioStandard (talk) 05:20, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
PS: You're probably right about the two account names being the same person. I'll mention that for the reviewing admin's attention, on the old article's talk page, as well. He or she will probably block Sjei as a username violation, and ask that the editor stick with Bearezzan. Cheers, mate!  – OhioStandard (talk) 05:28, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Update: I nominated the old article for speedy deletion, leaving a detailed note for the reviewing admin on its talk page ... which may be a redlink by the time you see this. The note was specific enough for any conscientious admin to be able to figure out what should be done; it included, e.g. notice of the three accounts, including the Sjei7 one that you found, apparent evidence of copypaste copyvio from a (former?) website for the school at http://sjei.bravehost.com/, and a couple other things. Thanks again for your work on this, and, once again, for the recognition on my talk. Cheers,  – OhioStandard (talk) 10:06, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
I think the page should be redirected, otherwise it seems all good. How did you get that template that says "Welcome to my talk page" and such (its on your talk page)?
Thanks for everything, cheers, Mate!
Riley Huntley (talk) No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 23:36, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
For some reason I hadn't thought of simply redirecting the "Saint" article to the "St." article, rather than deleting it first, and then recreating the page as a redirect, but your suggestion does seem more reasonable. Re an edit mode notice for your talk page, I'm tempted to say "you get a code to activate that with your first pay cheque", just to be annoying, but really, just click the following redlink User_talk:Riley_Huntley/Editnotice, enter whatever wikitext you want, and click "Save page" to create it. Mine's located at a corresponding path name, of course, viz. User_talk:Ohiostandard/Editnotice.
You're welcome to copy mine, or anyone else's, for that matter. ( You'll have to go into edit mode to see the wikitext, of course, which you're welcome to do for the purposes of copying it. ) They're all at a corresponding location under the user's talk page. Look at User_talk:Moonriddengirl/Editnotice for a very different example; she's the Wiki's resident copyright expert. I should perhaps mention that the markup language (aka "wikitext") for mine is pretty complicated and finicky; it took a lot of tries for me to get it to display properly. Just fair warning in case you decide to try to modify it in some way for your own use. I didn't write it myself, btw; I copied the basic pattern from some other user I no longer remember, quite a while ago, and played with it until I got the result I wanted. Cheers,  – OhioStandard (talk) 19:26, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Oh just two other quick comments: (1) If you decide to welcome new users with the template I mentioned above, {{w-graphical}}, be sure to substitute it. In other words, enter {{subst:w-graphical}} on the user's talk page. There's also a related one, for IPs, viz. {{w-graphical-anon}}, which also has to be substituted. (2) I noticed above that you said "removal of content is considered vandalism". You might like to have a look at WP:VANDALISM and especially its subsection, How not to respond to vandalism. Briefly, vandalism always has to be intentional, an intentional, purposeful effort to damage the encyclopaedia. A new user, or any user, actually, who deletes a section or three in the belief that doing so will improve the article, is not a vandal; he's only made a WP:BOLD edit, regardless of whether you believe he's right that it improves the encyclopaedia.
I don't mean to scold you, of course, which it certainly isn't my place to do, anyway. I only mention it because it's considered a personal attack, and I've seen many people get in trouble at AN/I for using the word in that way. I don't want you to get hauled there by some hothead, yourself, over something so avoidable. Cheers,  – OhioStandard (talk) 19:57, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

A Welcome from STiki

Hello, ~riley, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Here are some pages which are a little more fun:

  • The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users!
  • Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes!

We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page, and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Orphan Wiki (talk) 22:37, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Missing warning

Hi, I don't know if this was an accident or intentional on your part but it appears that Huggle didn't warn the user when you reverted this edit. Just to let you know. Usb10 plug me in 01:43, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Heey, thanks for catching that, must have been a glitch of some sort.
Nice meeting you, Mate!
-Riley Huntley (talk) No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 01:50, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

A message from Jquevedo007

Hello Riley Huntley,

I don't know how to go about doing this. I am Joseph Quevedo, I am a professional recording artist. I have recorded locally, nationally and internationally. I am a christian drummer and percussionist and have recorded with christian and non-christian artists. from famous artists to local up-comming artists. I have been on tour with a few artists as well. I do this for a living. I am what they call a back-up drummer. A back-up drummer is the drummer that comes in only when the actual drummer is ill or cannot make it. I step in for the band and let the show go on. I have never been the lead or main drummer or percussionist. Warner Music, Sony, Epic, Word Entertainment and Intergity Music use me as (on Call). I have played and recorded for a few srtists for example, Ricky Martin, Lisa Marie Presley, Jaci Velasquez, Crystal Lewis, Marcus Witt, Michael W. Smith, Amy Grant, Jars of Clay, Felix Rodriquez, Misael & Freedom, Sound Sphere, Mary Alessi, Livan Trujillo, Face 2 Face, Ed Calle, Arturo Sandoval, Tito Puente, Jr, Etc... I am named on most of there CDs on some I never was named. It didn't bother me because I was paid and in actually that is what matters not the recorgnition.... I am a humble man. But for some tht I am on the cd, I am not found on wikipedia and I wanted to fix that. how can i do this in one shot? who can i do this will your approval? I do I correct this issue? do you have an email, I can sent it to and you edit it for me? Or do I re edit it and you appove or them? I will only list or edit, what is correct and not remove or vandolize the encyclopedia. please let me know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jquevedo007 (talk • contribs) 05:27, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Crystal Chappell

Can I ask your justification for reverting my edit to Crystal Chappell? --Syffyllys (talk) 01:03, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Hello, I reverted your edit because it was of the choice of word you used, and some people can be offended by it. It should be "who will be featured in the first homosexual storyline for the show." but that is in my own opinion, since it is the formal word.
Cheers,
Riley Huntley (talk) No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 14:25, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
I disagree with your assessment. 'Gay' is a commonly accepted term to refer to homosexuals generally, and appears in other Wikipedia articles where appropriate, including an article specifically about the word, Gay. In the Crystal Chappell article, it is a prominent fact regarding the storyline. It was also the wording used in the source article and for those reasons it should not have been reverted.
Your opinion that the word 'gay' will offend people is your opinion, and that's fine, but if we all edited articles and took out things that we personally find offensive, even if they are in an accepted and appropriate usage, Wikipedia would be a much different place. Some people would be offended by the word 'homosexual', and some people would be offended by the very idea of gays or homosexuals at all, but we don't start censoring any mention of gays or things related to gays because of that. I have reverted the article and linked the word 'gay' to the article, Gay. Thanks,
--Syffyllys (talk) 19:10, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
Actually, the word gay already appears in the article in the paragraph above it, so I've changed the link in the article on the word Gay to it.
--Syffyllys (talk) 19:36, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Betsy Kolbert

The information added removed by the IP editor was essentially correct, but also unsourced so it's WP:OR--Wlmg (talk) 02:03, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Could you give me the link to the article? There is no Betsy Kolbert on Wikipedia.
Cheers,
Riley Huntley (talk) No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 14:20, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
Oh Betsy is her nickname Elizabeth Kolbert is her given name. I knew the family personally. Wlmg (talk) 15:37, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
I reverted the edit because the contributor didn't say the reason for the removal of content. Since you knew the family personally, could you change it to how it should be? That would be great.
Cheers,
Riley Huntley (talk) No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 20:31, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Zach Vega (talk to me) 23:37, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

IRC cloak request

Hello Riley Huntley. You recently applied for a Wikimedia IRC cloak, but it looks like you forgot to register your nickname first. Could you please log on to IRC and do:

/msg NickServ REGISTER <password> <email>

where <password> is a password of your choice and <email> is your e-mail address? After you do that, please follow the instructions that are e-mailed to you to confirm your e-mail address. When you're done with that, I just need you to confirm your cloak request:

/msg MemoServ send wmfgc IRC cloak request

After you finish all of that, I'd be happy to get you a cloak. :-) If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my Meta talk page. PeterSymonds (talk) 16:21, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thanks for your contributions. SwisterTwister talk 05:40, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
Hello, ~riley. You have new messages at Bishnu Saikia's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
ana baxsoliani Baxsoliani (talk) 18:02, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

A beer for you!

jkljkl;amn;p Mr. ledbetter (talk) 20:27, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Great work! Tow Trucker talk 05:55, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Thank you for having helped me

PGalliadi (talk) 14:33, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
Congratulations, Riley Huntley, you've recently made your 1,000th edit to articles on English Wikipedia.

Thank you for protecting the encyclopedia from vandalism, and for all your help and guidance of new users. Keep up the great work! :) Maryana (WMF) (talk) 00:48, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3→Archive 5

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Widr (talk) 07:52, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Talk page warnings

Hi ~riley, me again. Just wanted to give you a heads up that when a user already has a level 1 vandalism warning on their talk page for a given month, you should apply a level 2 vandalism warning for a second infraction, and so on. There are four levels of warnings, and once a user is given four warnings in a given month an administrator may block the account/IP. Thanks for your help! Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:45, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

@Eagles247: Hi Eagle, I am quite aware of how talk page warnings work. If you look at the tag on my edits, you'll notice I am using a semi-automated tool similar to Huggle. If you notice that talk page warnings are not being given correctly, you can file a bug or give feedback at meta:SWViewer. These are not manual edits so I hope you understand. Thank you. ~riley (talk) 18:57, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Thanks, I've left a note there. Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:03, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
@Eagles247: Just wanted to follow up and let you know that your feedback has significantly improved SWViewer on enwiki. Escalation issues were fixed, improved warnings were added, deletion notifications have been added, etc. Thanks again! ~riley (talk) 03:27, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Awesome! Happy to help. Eagles 24/7 (C) 03:42, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Can you take a look

I noticed you're an Admin on Commons, so I thought you'd could help. File:Kip Selbach.jpg is displaying incorrectly, in "view" mode all text and templates are shown double, the uploaded version image is different from the main file image. I have no idea what's going on, please ping me with your findings. Thanx, - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 06:52, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

@FlightTime Phone:  Done File:Kip Selbach.jpg is now displaying correctly, commons:File:Kip Selbach2.jpg is a different image that was showing due to T30299. ~riley (talk) 07:03, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Yeah, I noticed the difference after you fixed it. Thanx for your help. Cheers, - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 07:05, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:~riley/Archive_1&oldid=1139344791"