User talk:Rikyu

Welcome!

Hello, Rikyu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! NickelShoe (Talk) 01:53, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting

Thanks for informing me. It's dealt with now. BTW, reverting isn't too hard: have a look at Meta:Help:Reverting and you should be able to figure it out without too much trouble. If you want, you can practice it in the sandbox. Oh, and it's cool to see an ethnomusicologist here. I'm a music theorist, myself. OK, see you later! Heimstern Läufer 19:10, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Guido Adler

Dear Rikyu, do you think you might attempt to write some more in this article? It's an idle inquiry, but it started so well and the subject was so interesting...! And the missing years sound so fascinating. I have only a very short bit about him in my 1924 dictionary. And are you at all interested in Otto Abraham (b. 1872) the musical psychologist and collector of phonographed Japanese, Turkish and Indian melodies? I can't find a wp article for him at all, and again I have just a short notice. b/w, Eebahgum (talk) 23:51, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indosphere

Thanks for your comment on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indosphere. It prompted me to look for more references on Indosphere, which might be useful as resources for the article. I've responded to your comment on the AfD page. Please take a look when you get a chance. Regards, deeptrivia (talk) 19:29, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, Rikyu. Abecedare and I have severely edited the Indosphere article, removing everything that was unreferenced. I does require a round of expansion, to include more references, but I am wondering if you would like to take a look to see if there is still something that needs to be chopped off. Thanks a lot for your time. Regards, deeptrivia (talk) 01:45, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Asia

Hi, this is in response to your edit here [1]. The first edit was a map that that was missing Georgia, which was leftover vandalism from banned user User:Selma Kaufmann. The difference is subtle but can be seen here: [2] [3] The second was a political map that seemed out of place in the physical geography section. As such, I could've left a more detailed summary, however English is a second language and at times I am a little hasty with edits. Hope this explains it better. Regards, Kayrat Tuntekov (talk) 16:19, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Geek.Kon, external links

Just a heads up: external links are usually be added to the bottom of the article, in a section typically titled "External links." I moved the link you added to Geek.Kon in just this way. You can see the change I made for reference. (The other option is as citations using <ref> tags, but that wouldn't have been appropriate in this situation as it wasn't citing a particular claim. Thanks for the contribution! — Alan De Smet | Talk 22:43, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Isawa Shūji, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Meiji (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]