User talk:Righteous.12

@ Charlesdrakew and Sitush, how many Arains u both will block. You both don't want to see truth and truth will win. ARAINS are Arab and by the way what's the reason you two or any one of you comparing Jatt status here on Arain's Wikipedia article. The article is about Arain so it doesn't make any sense that one should mention either Jatts were landholders for larger scale in Lahore area than Arains and this statement is also 100 % lie. Arain have landholding status in all over the Pakistan provinces Punjab and Sindh and before 1947 they were a big landholding class in Indian Punjab too. To say the true facts about my origin ismy right and no body can take my freedom of speech! Understand.

Welcome!

Hello, Righteous.12, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 09:27, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

related to the [[Pakistani politics]] its mention that Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq was born in a religious [[[Arain]] family. <ref>www.nihcr.edu.pk/latest_english.../1.</ref>
{| cellpadding="1" cellspacing="4" style="margin:3px; background:#f8f8f8; border:1px solid #aaa;"

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:27, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Righteous.12, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Righteous.12! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:23, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Hello, I'm Sitush. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of Saraiki tribes, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 06:28, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Arabs in Pakistan. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Charles (talk) 10:08, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jan 02, 2015

Hello, this is Righteous.12, For you kind information I have edited the information on the article Arabs in Pakistan having legal and proper proofs. Also ″Gujjar″ a caste/tribe of Pakistan have never claimed to be Arabs and they were the locals or Aryan race of Indian Subcontinent. If you are wondering to block me, then sure block me but again how many editor of true information you gone stop? Hope the referenced link I have provided will help you to understand the correct information.

March 2015

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Sardar Ayaz Sadiq. If you make a substantive change to any article, tell what you are doing in the Edit summary and be sure there is a WP:Reliable source for the information that you provide. Thank you. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 07:37, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Hello, I'm Mahensingha. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Chaudhry because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please stop removing sourced contents from the article. Mahensingha _{(Talk) "Thanx n Regards"} 21:55, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Naseem Hijazi. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Charles (talk) 08:15, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@MahenSingha, Choudhary tittle is used a Muslim tribe (Arain tribe) infact Arain is an Arabic race but the individuals of Arain trib who holds big tracts of agricultural land write local Indian tittle Choudhry with their names. Choudhary Muhammad Ali of Pakistan was also an Arain.

@ Charlesdrakew, Naseem Hijazi was Arain. Hijazi family name of Arains represents their Arab origin and please don't remove my provided information on Wikipedia's article Arain because I am providing accurate information about Arain.

June 2015

Hello, I wanted you to know that your recent contributions to Arain (tribe) were disruptive. Clearly, you haven't read the Talk:Arain (tribe)
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Pixarh (talk) 18:25, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your unnecessary edits on Arain (tribe) are breaking the flow of the topic. The given references are also not relevant to the topic. None of the edits provide a reliable source. Markangle11 (talk) 19:31, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been continually made more than 3 edits within 24 hours regardless of informing you not to make such edits both here and on the article's talk page.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Arain (tribe). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Pixarh (talk) 19:44, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Pixrah, Its hard for me to understand that why you are saying to me that I sm vandalizing the Wikipidia article "Arain Tribe". I myself also a desandent of this tribe and I know detailed history abouth my origin.http://webgallery.fh4u.net/gallery/History_of_Arain.html

Please visit the link I have posted. The ancestors of Arains who were entered to Indian Subcontinent with Muhammad Bin Qasim had established two independent states in Subcontinent. Multan and Al Mansura. I presented the link that I have posted above and wonder to know why u removed my provided accurate information from this article. Please don't do this next time.

Trust me, it's equally hard for me to understand 'your English'. Being a descendant of a particular tribe does not necessarily mean you have adequate knowledge about it. The link contains one letter from Hajjaj bin Yusuf with no mention of Multan or Mansura. So your link fails. In any case, the very mention of these states is irrelevant in accordance to the article. Also, if you do not know about WP:VAN then first acquaint yourself with WP:PG and then proceed with editing. Your talk page is a proof that you are constantly engaged in editing as WP:FORUM. Having clarified more than required, remember that you have already been warned against vandalism to avoid trouble. Pixarh (talk) 20:55, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Arain, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Charles (talk) 21:54, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sanctions

You are being repeatedly disruptive at Arain. Please take note of the warning below. - Sitush (talk) 08:03, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

And still you persist with your disruptive edits? Please note my query in the edit summary for my revert. You are going to have to discuss that removal on the article talk page. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 18:53, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Your recent editing history at Arain shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Charles (talk) 20:33, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Philg88 ^♦talk 12:38, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 18:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Righteous.12. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]