User talk:RightGot
Vera Van Wagner listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Vera Van Wagner. Since you had some involvement with the Vera Van Wagner redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. WWGB (talk) 05:03, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Oldest in Britain
[edit]Is there any reason it isn't considered a reliable source? Has there ever been an incident where it gave information that was inaccurate?
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, RightGot. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
9:00 listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 9:00. Since you had some involvement with the 9:00 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 02:23, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Kane Tanaka for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kane Tanaka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kane Tanaka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 18:26, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Deletion review for Kane Tanaka
[edit]An editor has asked for a deletion review of Kane Tanaka. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 100.40.125.198 (talk) 20:42, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, RightGot. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
December 2018
[edit]Edits like this and this are a nuisance and a waste of time for other editors. Would you care to justify them? DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 23:59, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Maria Giuseppa Robucci for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maria Giuseppa Robucci is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Giuseppa Robucci until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — JFG talk 23:21, 11 July 2019 (UTC)