User talk:Rifatwikism

September 2017

Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to Swati Chaturvedi, especially if it involves living persons. Thank you. Lourdes 14:19, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Asking for reliable web links that support a claim is defamatory? Since when?

Your recent editing history at Swati Chaturvedi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Lourdes 14:47, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your are behaving just like journalists in India behave. Mafia. You essentially are saying that I can argue but you will keep ignoring. Rifatwikism