User talk:Ridax2020

Ridax2020, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ridax2020! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Russo-Ukrainian War

Hi, I have seen you was active in this article. Please take a part in the discussion here.--Sputnik13 (talk) 16:52, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:War_in_Iraq_(2013%E2%80%9317)#We_agreed_to_move_to_War_in_Iraq_(2013%E2%80%932017) Shadow4dark (talk) 13:05, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please wait until you have more experience before you close more requested moves. I had to spend a lot of time cleaning up after you. Thanks, wbm1058 (talk) 19:40, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And please don't close RMs where you have !voted per WP:NACINV, as you did at Talk:2016 Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. Iffy★Chat -- 16:15, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding some of your diffs, which have been listed at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Kurds. The thread is Advice re: would we need a new admin?. Thank you. Levivich ^harass/_hound 17:40, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t know what wrong things i did Ridax2020 (talk) 19:28, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Am I not allowed to edit Ridax2020 (talk) 19:28, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The only mistakes i did were move articles myself after not knowing wikipedia policies which were 2. The rest of the edits I did were clearly not biased at all, and most of the normal edits I did were in the thread for no reason, like me changing the name Iraqi civil war (2014-2017) in an article to war in iraq because of the original article’s name being changed Ridax2020 (talk) 19:33, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just to be clear, I am not an administrator and I have no authority to tell you not to edit or anything else. I'm notifying you that I listed some of your edits at the page Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Kurds, which is a page of edits that's part of a discussion at WP:AN#Advice re: would we need a new admin?. You and all other editors are welcome to participate in that discussion if you want to, but you are not required to. At this point I don't think you are required to do or not do anything because of my notification; I am notifying you that the discussion is happening so you can join it if you want to (I am required by our rules to make this notification). Levivich ^harass/_hound 19:37, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. I thought I was going to be banned for the edits i made lol Ridax2020 (talk) 20:57, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hi Ridax2020! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Second Libyan Civil War that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 12:44, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ridax2020 (talk) 12:56, 8 February 2021 (UTC) Lol you are back, i know who you are.Shadow4dark (talk) 16:02, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Ridax2020! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Berek (talk) 08:50, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ridax2020 (talk) 11:56, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Battles of the War in Iraq (2013–2017) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Battles of the War in Iraq (2013–2017), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:29, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I clearly said the article was not done to be written. I’ll rewrite it fully before publishing it Ridax2020 (talk) 10:30, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will slowly work on the draft before creating the full article, I just hope the older article is removed so I could reuse its name by the time I’m done. Ridax2020 (talk) 10:33, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Mikehawk10 (talk) 20:02, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your closure of the 2021 Israel–Palestine crisis requested move

Hi, your non-admin closure of the the requested move: Talk:2021_Israel–Palestine_crisis#Requested_move_13_May_2021 was inappropriate. Please read WP:RMCLOSE – in general you shouldn't be closing them as an involved editor, though you can withdraw a requested move you yourself opened only if opposition against it was unanimous or no one has yet !voted, which was not the case. Can you please re-open the requested move so it can be closed by an uninvolved editor? Edit: thanks for doing just that. :) ‑‑Volteer1 (talk) 15:24, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for being inexperienced I’m not that knowledgeable about wikipedia Ridax2020 (talk) 19:21, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All good, don't worry about it. ‑‑Volteer1 (talk) 19:37, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About Isreali Aggression

According to my point of veiw if it is correct then accept it if it is wrong then reject it Isreal did aggressive in gaza it must be stoped and economically sanctioned by world countries must be declared as terrorist state by the world leaders and by the UN Sheikhupuri (talk) 22:07, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:IbrahimWeed per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/IbrahimWeed. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:19, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ridax2020 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

First of all, there is no evidence that I am that person. Second of all, you focused on the articles I edited regarding the conflicts in Iraq, but ignored my other edits which overlap the ones in articles related to Iraq. Third of all, you’re an admin you can check our IP addresses and everything right? Just check it Ridax2020 (talk) 17:29, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Evidence was presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/IbrahimWeed. As indicated there, IP address information is not available (nor, for that matter, is it generally available to admins). Yamla (talk) 20:13, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.