User talk:Rickgalliard

Welcome!

Hello, Rickgalliard, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like The McCartney Years (band), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! CalendarWatcher (talk) 15:34, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of The McCartney Years (band)

A tag has been placed on The McCartney Years (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. CalendarWatcher (talk) 15:34, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Yuri George Jan Pool, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. CalendarWatcher (talk) 15:36, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of London Music Award

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article London Music Award, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Music award, with no sources nor the slightest indication of impact, even within its town. Part of a Walled garden propping up a non-notable musician's articles.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. CalendarWatcher (talk) 15:39, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yuri George Jan Pool

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Yuri George Jan Pool, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Working--but not notable--musician.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. CalendarWatcher (talk) 15:41, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Out Of Thin Air (album)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Out Of Thin Air (album), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Musical recording, with no indication of impact, sales, media coverage, reviews or even regional charting. Seems indistinguishable from an advert.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. CalendarWatcher (talk) 15:43, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Mr Galliard, do you represent The McCartney Years or Yuri George Jan Pool or have some other close connection with these subjects in real life? Kind regards, --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:45, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking the time to reply to my question. Kind regards. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:27, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Significance

If the artist you represent is insignificant to those living outside of the city this artist operates in, yes, there is every reason for deletion of this article. Wikipedia exists to document fame and importance, not to promote it nor host advertising. So no, it's apparent that any misunderstanding is not on my part and my tagging is WLL within norms. --CalendarWatcher (talk) 23:14, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There's no evidence that the artist you represent--or which you are--is significant even within his own city. You've certainly offered no real evidence of notability. --CalendarWatcher (talk) 12:14, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quote: I encourage you to support your claims why this is not significant.

You have it entirely backwards: you are the one making claims and you're the one who must support them, and with more than passing stories about traffic-jamming publicity stunts. Once again, Wikipedia exists as a way to record actual notability, not enhance--or create--it. This is not a free advertising service for brand-new bands or their associated musicians, and you would be well advised not to presume so. --CalendarWatcher (talk) 14:08, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your wikilawyering is here-by noted. But to the specifics:

' WP:BAND Article #12: "Has been the the subject of a half hour or longer broadcast across a national radio or TV network" Runtime 31:21 minutes, live broadcast on A-Channel on January 30'

Except that it's obviously a single local television station, not a national network, and there's no evidence of any over-the-air transmission, just an on-line video.

'Significant coverage"" The sources address the subject directly in detail'

Except that it's a single story from a local newspaper, its subject is the publicity stunt, and as it's only a few paragraphs in length it covers nothing in detail.

' The sources indicated have editorial integrity'

Except that that clause is irrelevant if there's no coverage that's applicable.

And to correct your consistent misunderstanding, yes, persons actively attempting to introduce material into Wikipedia are absolutely required, both as fundamental site policy and common sense, to provide evidence of their claims. Note that the very first sentence of that last link reads The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material.

You've made no real attempt to contribute to Wikipedia generally, but instead are taking concerted steps to get around explicit rules in order to get your way. This leads to the obvious question as to why you're here, and to what appears to me to be the obvious answer. So, once again, This is not a free advertising service for brand-new bands or their associated musicians, and you would be well advised not to presume so. --CalendarWatcher (talk) 22:07, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Yuri George Jan Pool

I have nominated Yuri George Jan Pool, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuri George Jan Pool. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. CalendarWatcher (talk) 23:22, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]