User talk:Rick Norton

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of FrenchPeople (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:48, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rick Norton (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There is not evidence that show I am connected to FrenchPeople. You blocked me as I edit the semi-protected page, because needs more articles. I'm an autoconfirmed user. The account is not to disrupt Wikipedia but the account helps to editing uncorrected and full grammar errors, spelling fix and some typos. Meanwhile, this is unbelievable and disappointing block. I'm apologise my fault.

Decline reason:

Sockpuppetry is obvious. You don't need to apologise, you need to stop creating sockpuppet accounts to evade your block. Yamla (talk) 12:01, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.