User talk:Richbrowncrs
Hello, Richbrowncrs, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking 
or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! EvergreenFir (talk) 16:19, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Introduction
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
- Frequently asked questions
- Cheatsheet
- Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
- The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
- Help pages
- Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
Feb 22
[edit]Can you please read wp:indent and wp:sign?Slatersteven (talk) 15:59, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
I think you also need to read wp:spa wp:not and wp:soap.Slatersteven (talk) 16:18, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Its time for you to read wp:tenditious, you have been told what you need to do. Now I suggest you take up ending other articles. This will be my last word (and final warning) here.Slatersteven (talk) 16:37, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Based on your contributions to other articles, you should also read WP:POINT. —C.Fred (talk) 16:39, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- THis is indented as a reply to me, is it?Slatersteven (talk) 16:39, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Slatersteven: No, that was addressed to Richbrowncrs, but it was following in your thread. —C.Fred (talk) 16:42, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- THis is indented as a reply to me, is it?Slatersteven (talk) 16:39, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
February 2022
[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Encyclopædia Britannica. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 16:41, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- This edit is blatant vandalism. If you keep making edits like that, you will quickly find yourself blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 16:44, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Slatersteven (talk) 16:44, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —C.Fred (talk) 16:44, 12 February 2022 (UTC)