User talk:Richard clarkson

December 2017

Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that in this edit to Bitcoin Gold, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 00:05, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You simply stated the information is incorrect. If there are reliable, verifiable sources that can be cited for your edit, you can add them to the content as an opposing view without deleting the sourced content or you can put them on the talk page (with note in the edit summary to that effect) to prove your point. See especially Wikipedia:Verifiability.

Helpful information about editing Wikipedia can be found on various Wikipedia guideline and policy pages including: Help:Getting started; Wikipedia:Introduction; Wikipedia:Simplified ruleset; Wikipedia:Simplified Manual of Style; Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners; Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources; Wikipedia:Citing sources; Help:Footnotes; Wikipedia:Verifiability; Wikipedia:No original research; Wikipedia:Neutral point of view; Wikipedia:Notability; Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons; Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not; Wikipedia:Words to watch; Help:Introduction to talk pages; Wikipedia:Copyright Problems and Help:Contents. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 00:08, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bitcoin Gold

Hi, if you want to remove verified content please discuss on talk page first Biofase ^flame| stalk 07:00, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, as discussed bring any further edits the the article talk page. Wikipedia doesn't employ censorship to protect anyone or anything. Information is referenced and both truthful and factual. If there's any further opposing view that are covered in the media you are welcome to add them with sources for verification. Any further edits like these will be seen as edit warring and will be reported as a violation of wikipedia's rules of conduct. Biofase ^flame| stalk 09:18, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Bitcoin Gold shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Greyjoy^talk 09:31, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]