User talk:Richard Rowe

1809 volcanic eruption

Hello Richard, thanks for the message on my page, I now fixed the reference problem. The general idea is to place <ref>Reference</ref> at the end of the sentence you are referencing, which will produce a proper inline-citation in the reference section. For example,

This is a sentence.<ref>J. Smith (1999) "Book of Things", p.14 ISBN 012-3-456-78901-2</ref> This is another sentence.<ref>T. O'neil (2001) "Other Book of Things", p.57 ISBN 321-3-456-78901-2</ref>

;Reference
{{reflist}}

;Further reading
*B. Jones (2008) "Book of Weird Things", ISBN 098-7-654-32109-8

will produce the following text:

This is a sentence. This is another sentence.

References

Further reading

• B. Jones (2008) "Other Book of Things", ISBN 098-7-654-32109-8

The first two reference (inline-references) are used to support specific sentences, while the 3rd reference (the one at the end) is used to support the "general" idea and give readers more information about the topic.

I hope this clarifies on how to use references in wikipedia. Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 20:54, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Move

So you think the 1809 volcanic eruption page should be deleted, because the page was not done well or because wiki shouldn't have an article about that event? --Richard Rowe (talk) 20:55, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

I moved your article to User:Richard Rowe/1809 volcanic eruption on the ground of copyright violation (see WP:COPYVIO). Wikipedia is written by simply copy-pasting sources, you must use your own words. Usually it would be deleted, but I moved it to one of your user-pages so you can continue to work on it.

Second, not to discourage you, but Wikipedia is not a news agency. I think it would be better to write an article about the temperature decline in during 1810-1819 in general saying that the later part of the decline was explained by the Tambora eruption, but the first part of the decline was unaccounted for, with researchers from the SDSU reporting evidence for another, earlier eruption. Otherwise, chances are your article will be deleted. For example, there's no article on the "2008 discovery of a second class of superconductor families", but the 2nd family is mentioned in a more general articles (aka superconductor article).

The problem is that this is sort of a vague ill-defined event. There was an eruption in 1809, or so this team says, but there's so little information on the eruption itself. Where did it happen? What volcano? Is it confirmed by another independent team? Essentially, we want an article on the eruption, and not on the discovery of the eruption. And since there's so little to say about the volcano eruption itself, it's pretty hard to make a whole article out of that. However you could probably write one on the 1810-1819 temperature decline, since that would be much better documented.

Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 21:12, 8 December 2009 (UTC)