User talk:Richard Maxwell

Thanks

Thanks, and nice to hear from you. I certainly intend to follow up your thoughts if and when there's a new edition of the Dictionary of Languages. I guess, meanwhile, we'll be meeting on Wikipedia from time to time ... Best wishes Andrew Dalby 15:39, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

You asked about my education. I won't add this information to Andrew Dalby, because it's bad form to expand your own Wikipedia biography, but, since you ask, I'll tell you and put it on my user page.

I don't claim to be a great linguist: if I have a skill in this area, it's simply that languages don't frighten me. I was at Bristol Grammar School, where I learned some Latin, French and Greek; then at the University of Cambridge. There I studied Latin and Greek at first, afterwards Romance languages and linguistics. I got a bachelor's degree in 1970. I gained familiarity with some other languages because of my work at Cambridge University Library, where I had to work with foreign serials and afterwards with South and Southeast Asian materials. To help me with this -- I didn't know any of the languages in advance -- I took classes in Cambridge again (in Sanskrit, Hindi and Pali) and in London (in Burmese and Thai). I never got far with the last two because I didn't remain in the Oriental field for long enough. I did a part-time Ph.D. in ancient history (in 1987-93), which improved my Latin and Greek. Living in France makes me go on learning French, and Wikipedia and my writing make me keep in practice with other languages.

All the best Andrew Dalby 16:30, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for adding that info to my biography. I wouldn't do it myself, but no reason why you shouldn't! Andrew Dalby 11:47, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

{{uw-3rr|Disemvoweling}}

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Disemvoweling. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Thank you. (OK, I admit I should warn myself, also....) — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 07:54, 27 April 2007 (UTC)