User talk:Richard Kaufman

Hello, Richard Kaufman. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Richard J. Kaufman, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 23:05, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request Unblocking

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Richard Kaufman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The methods for magic tricks, and certainly the method for what is perhaps the most famous card routine of the twentieth century, are not to be divulged to laymen frivolously on public web pages despite the extensive discussion of this matter in the Talk section. Removing the description from this page is not "vandalism," but a form of valiant protest against the original author's high-falutin view of themselves as the arbiter of whether or not the method should be exposed. Since the methods for magic tricks are collectively "owned" by the magic world and its members, it has always been standard operating procedure that the methods may be explained to the public in a situation in which they have to pay for them, such as in a book. Whether the book is purchased or consulted at a library, the curious party has to invest money, time, or both in pursuit of the method. The original author of this entry does not have the RIGHT to explain the method here. Discospinster states that I have no interest in building an encyclopedia. The truth is that I do not have an interested in building an encyclopedia of methods for magic tricks, the posters of which do not own the material they are explaining to the public.

Decline reason:

Self-admitted block-evading WP:SOCK. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 20:26, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Richard Kaufman (talk) 17:58, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request appears to refer to User:Charle the Tuna. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 18:30, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am Charlie the Tuna. Richard Kaufman (talk) 18:39, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]