User talk:Richard Giuly

Image tagging for Image:BFP aperture.png

Thanks for uploading Image:BFP aperture.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:05, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Easy fix

Since you seem to have created this image yourself, you probably want to add one of the following tags to the image's description page:

{{pd-self}}—Public Domain.
{{GFDL-self}}—GNU Free Documentation License written by the Free Software Foundation. This was originally written to license free software documentation.

Adding either of the above tags indicates that you give Wikipedia (and others) permission to use the image you created. Ask me on my talk page if you need help with this.--Srleffler 05:05, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Srleffler 04:48, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I moved the contents you added about the back focal plane, merging them with the existing article Cardinal point (optics).--Srleffler 04:48, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Rgiuly.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Rgiuly.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:04, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

QR decomposition

Hello Richard, and also a warm welcome from me. I came here to thank you for your comment on Talk:QR decomposition. Finding errors is one of the most useful things to do here.

I notice that you got some messages regarding copyrights on images. Our policies are sometimes hard to find and understand. Please feel free to ask me if you have any questions. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 12:46, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm actually not sure exactly how to reply through the wiki in a way that you will get the message - is it best to use your talk page or mine? But in anycase - thanks Jitse for checking my question and putting it into effect. As for images, I think I've figured them out now. Richard Giuly 06:40, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There are two different systems for replying. One is to keep the reply on the same page as where the question was asked. This has the advantage that the conversation is kept together. The disadvantage is that the reply might not be noticed, but people should add the user talk page to their watchlist if they ask a question, so that they'll see it when there is a reply. The other system is to reply on the talk page of the person you're replying to. That has the advantage that you get a bright message that there is some new text on your talk page, so it's almost impossible to miss the reply. You can use whichever system you like best. My impression is that the first system is a bit more common. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 05:07, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

got it, thanks Richard Giuly 05:09, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

File:Back focal plane optics (diagram).png missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Back focal plane optics (diagram).png

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:07, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rgiuly.gif listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rgiuly.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]