User talk:Richard Gibb

January 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Gibbs (surname), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 20:36, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Gibb. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 20:52, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Gibb. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Binksternet (talk) 06:55, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Gibb has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Gibb was changed by Richard Gibb (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.877719 on 2019-01-21T10:34:33+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:34, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Gibb/Gibbs of England

Do you wish me to cite all the published articles and documents in verification of my statement regarding the history of the Gibb/s family? There are a great many. I am only the latest in a long line of Remembrancers (Chroniclers) of the family. A Considerable amount of the family records/photos/Portraits are held by Kew, the National Portrait Gallery and similar. Naturally, they don't allow me to take the documents out nor indeed will the Scottish Records Office where you can examine all the documents relating to the Kings of Scotland though they are very fragile, you need an appointment and approval as well as the ability to read Latin. The same applies to the English and French Heralds Courts and they Scottish Lyon Heraldic Court. Finally, one of the papers I would refer you to is from the Vatican and relates to the history of the Cardinals.

Up to now the Remembrancers have not had to deal with open Social Media where unfortunately it appears you can publish whatever rubbish you choose to do without any come back or being held to account.

Richard Gibb — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard Gibb (talk • contribs) 21:10, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

First, welcome to Wikipedia Richard. There is no issue with posting the history of the name Gibb's, if it is sufficiently notable, something that you will have to prove through reliable sources. Second, this appears to be a topic very close to your heart, and thus you may have some issue posting objectively, particularly in the assessment of notability and reliability of sources. If you believe you can overcome this, then you are very welcome to chronical the history of the family.

You mention some documents in the Scottish Records Office and others in Latin. If these meet the standards for sources, then those will be fine - the requirement is that they are accessible, even if it requires considerable effort or cost, and both of those sources do meet that requirement.

I will note that one issue you are finding is that the page you are contributing to is the wrong one. You should be creating a WP:DRAFT for the page Gibbs (surname), the first so you can work on the work without introducing unencyclopedic "Work in progress" paragraphs to the article, such as "I request that someone form Wikipedia assist me as the nature of your editing suite is problematic and will not let me file the 'Proofs' in the correct area.", the second as the page you are editing is a list of people with the name Gibbs, not an article on the name Gibbs.

It's also possible that your article will be about a specific family of the name Gibbs, as opposed to the general class, so you may find yourself needing to create a different, more specific title for your article.

As for the question you raised, in the quote included above, it might be helpful to read this for including proofs (references) -- NoCOBOL (talk) 11:42, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gibbs in England and Scotland (January 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gibbs in England and Scotland and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gibbs in England and Scotland, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 19:20, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Richard Gibb! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:20, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Robert McClenon. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:16, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Richard Gibb. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Cordless Larry (talk) 10:28, 22 January 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Your draft article, Draft:Gibbs in England and Scotland

Hello, Richard Gibb. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gibbs in England and Scotland".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TheTrainNoch (talk) 03:23, 27 July 2019 (UTC)