User talk:RichardSalway

Welcome

Hello RichardSalway and welcome to Wikipedia! I am Ukexpat and I would like to thank you for your contributions.

Getting Started First steps • FAQ Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting help Community Portal • Help desk • Village Pump Where to ask questions or make comments • Request administrator attention Wikipedia: The Missing Manual Place {{helpme}} on your talk page and a small message explaining the problem The Commmunity Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists		Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Click here to reply to this message.

ukexpat (talk) 18:53, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Jackson

If it's in the court documents, cite them, please. Meanwhile, please take a look at WP:SYNTH, WP:NPOV and WP:TE. Thanks. Rodhull andemu 22:14, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Michael Jackson. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Onorem ♠Dil 14:15, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Death of Baby P. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. —SpaceFlight89 15:07, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for Evasion of block of User:GranvilleHouston. You could not have made it more plain.. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Rodhull andemu 15:08, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Death of Baby P. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. WebHamster 15:09, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]