User talk:Rich Uncle Skeleton

Archives

Rich Uncle Skeleton ^(talk) is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Stalking?

I'm sure WP has a policy about stalking, and I'm sure you're in violation of it. I can't edit any single page without you going in and changing something. Do you wish to refute this? I am asking you politely to leave things I touch alone. I will return the favor, and respect your edits. While another section MAY have been warranted on that ip talk page, there are many other circumstances. Thank you for respecting my wishes. Carterdriggs 04:20, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think we just have similar pages on our watchlists. Nothing to get paranoid about. I have never even glanced at your list of contributions. You're probably assuming too much. I keep an eye on user talk pages I make comments on to prevent my comments from becoming intermingled with other topics not connected to my comments, which was the case you cited. Rich Uncle Skeleton ^(talk) 04:22, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If that is truly the case, I apologize. I just didn't know why you would possibly have that page on your watchlist. Odd that this address edited pages of mine, and you are the only user associated with it. Carterdriggs 04:26, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for jumping the gun. Carterdriggs 04:26, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's OK—my preferences are set to default "Watch" for any page I edit, so unless I consciously make an effort not to watch, it goes on. That's what happened there. Rich Uncle Skeleton ^(talk) 04:28, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake. I'll leave you well alone. Carterdriggs 04:42, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Question....Feel free to delete this after I ask, but I see that you edit a wide variety of articles, and I was wondering from where you get the idea to edit a specific one? do you go to a project page? Are you just browsing? I'm curious cause I'd like to get a lot more edits under my belt. Thanks Carterdriggs 07:29, 28 September 2007 (UTC) Also, on my watchlist page, I see numbers either green or red in () and was wondering if you knew what those meant. Carterdriggs 07:32, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I personally usually decide on articles just based on what I'm interested in—do a search, see what comes up. Once you find stuff you like working on, categories (found at the bottom of the article) can be useful in browsing to find related articles that might also interest you. (For instance, at the bottom of the Salt Lake Tabernacle organ page you'll see it's in the Category:Temple Square.)

The numbers you see are what the last editor did in editing the page. Green numbers mean the editor added content. Red numbers mean content was deleted. 0 means there was no net deletion or addition, but something was changed—maybe a rearrnagement, etc. I think the numbers are the numbers of bytes, i.e., individual letters, punctuation marks, etc. Rich Uncle Skeleton ^(talk) 08:46, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info. I appreciate it. Carterdriggs 09:01, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(Bickertonite)?

Interested parties who voiced opinions on this in the past, read all about it - the raging debate on moving the article on the definitely-not-Bickertonite Church of Jesus Christ has flared up again, at Talk:The_Church_of_Jesus_Christ#Requested_move.2C_take_two. Come back for more fun and games if you care to - thanks for playing... - Reaverdrop _(talk/nl) 05:00, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wingfield W. Watson

I started an article about Wingfield W. Watson. I did it because of my interest in the History of Wisconsin-my native state. There is lots of material about Wingfield W. Watson on the internet. Finally- I am not a member of the Latter Day Saints movement. I am interested in Wisconsin history and I feel Wingfield W. Watson is being overlook. Thank you- RFD 13:58, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Categories - mormon missionaries in X country

Hello. I've notice you've created a number of categories this evening in the format "Mormon Missionaries in X Country/Region". These seem to have just one entry in and I can't believe that there are sufficient notable examples in this area to sustain so many new categories. What is your view on this? B1atv 21:57, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In the process of populating. Wait until completed to judge it. Rich Uncle Skeleton ^(talk) 21:59, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. Thanks. B1atv 22:02, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

changes to the title of Satanic_ritual_abuse_and_The_Church_of_Jesus_Christ_of_Latter-day_Saints page

I wanted to let you know that they have locked in the changes to the title there. You might want to check it out. Abuse truth 01:37, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Editor's Barnstar
		This is awarded for all of the contributions made to the Latter-day Saint movement in addition to the users ability to search out and correct errors in spelling and grammar.Carter \| Talk it up 11:14, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AFD

A page you created, Satanic ritual abuse and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, has been nominated for deletion at the 7 August AFD page. I thought I would let you know since the nominator did not. Snocrates 00:30, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up. Sorry I can't contribute more there or elsewhere, as I'm really busy these days. I glance at my watchlist to keep up with the goings on but I just don't have time to do substantial editing like I used to. Rich Uncle Skeleton ^(talk) 00:59, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mormonism and history merge proposal

Please weigh in on the merger proposal between History of the Latter Day Saint movement and Mormonism and history. I saw that you were a recent contributor of one of the pages in question, and thought you would be interested.--Descartes1979 (talk) 21:23, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD

A Category you created, Category:People acquitted of sex crimes, has been nominated for deletion here. If you are interested, please join the discussion. Thanks. Ref ^(chew)(do) 10:53, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Mormonism and violence

An editor has nominated Mormonism and violence, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mormonism and violence and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 22:00, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Law of Chastity

You previously made some contributions to the article Law of Chastity, and there are some comments up for discussion on the talk page that you might like to weigh in on. -- btphelps ^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:13, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! A request for your input

Per wp:CANVASSING, this is a neutrally worded notice being sent, without any type of "selection" bias, to everyone that edited fairly recently the MOS page about how to term the Latter Day Saints denominations on Wikipedia in the belief that your various and collective expertise or expertises, if that's a plural, can help us improve its wording, if possible. a bit. The most pertinent section is here. And the issue is to what degree the terms "Mormon church" and "LDS church" relate to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, in specific, and to what kind of sourcing should be used to document this. Thanks, if you find time and the interest to look into the matter and offer your opinion or commentary.--Hodgson-Burnett's Secret Garden (talk) 23:07, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ichthus: January 2012

ICHTHUS

January 2012

In this issue...

Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here

Nomination of George R. Hill III for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article George R. Hill III is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George R. Hill III until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. p b p 14:08, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In some benign wp:CANVASSING

Community input is politely requested for Jimbo's tkpg with regard ur expertise in gen. notability per wp:GNG & applicabilities of eg wp:PROF, wp:AUTH, etc. w/in AfD's
... here: User talk:Jimbo Wales#Suggested fix.--Hodgdon's secret garden (talk) 01:00, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Robert K. Dellenbach for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert K. Dellenbach is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert K. Dellenbach until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:10, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michaelene P. Grassli for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michaelene P. Grassli is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michaelene P. Grassli until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:40, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paul Palmieri (Bickertonite) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Palmieri (Bickertonite) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Palmieri (Bickertonite) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

schetm (talk) 20:33, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]