User talk:Rich257/Archive/2008/March

Hoaxes

Hoaxes cannot be speedied. See WP:CSD. I changed Cadillac Bus back to a prod. DGG (talk) 15:33, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Julie Vargas

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Julie Vargas, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Julie Vargas. WLU (talk) 18:33, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

VistaPrint

Hi I saw the deletion on the offer. I added the pictures after seeing that another user added to the page. If I was to format their links, would it be appropriate? As is noted, I created the page and work for the company, with no external links to the offer I don't see how it is promotional. All of the additions had sources to back them up. I avoided editing them in the first place, because I am hoping that if someone else contributes that the COI tag will eventually be removed. Please let me know what you think. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeffespo20 (talk • contribs) 20:40, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

I didn't delete information on the offer I just shortened it to the key facts. The offer doesn't seem to me to be notable enough to warrant more than a couple of sentences and I'm not convinced that pictures of the cards add anything, if you want to see that you can go to the company's website. I retained the 3rd party references in the article, as you can see. Rich257 (talk) 20:52, 27 March 2008 (UTC)