User talk:Rich1208

Regarding your edits to Gella Vandecaveye:

Your recent edit to Gella Vandecaveye (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses, phone numbers, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, forum, or other such free-hosting website links to a non-talk page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 12:56, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ivan Drago, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ivan Drago was changed by Rich1208 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-11-18T00:11:25+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 00:12, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Apollo Creed, you will be blocked from editing. mattbuck (talk) 00:30, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:William Hope is Kyle in Hellbound Hellraiser 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:William Hope is Kyle in Hellbound Hellraiser 2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:50, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Julia(Clare Higgins) finishes Kyle (William Hope).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Julia(Clare Higgins) finishes Kyle (William Hope).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:05, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Clare Higgins.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Clare Higgins.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:05, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kyra Gracie in a Jiu-Jitsu match.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Kyra Gracie in a Jiu-Jitsu match.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:34, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Tamara Davies. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. [1] David Broadfoot (talk) 14:03, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Ann Maria Rousey DeMars. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. [2] David Broadfoot (talk) 14:04, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Apollo Creed. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. [3] David Broadfoot (talk) 14:05, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ned Beatty, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. [4] David Broadfoot (talk) 14:07, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Deliverance, you will be blocked from editing. [5] and [6] David Broadfoot (talk) 14:21, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Gella Vandecaveye, you will be blocked from editing. Stop compromising Wikipedia by making up information as you did here: [7] David Broadfoot (talk) 14:45, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cut it out.You are ruining the work of others,and that is not acceptable.Please stop vandalising wikipedia or you may be blocked.¤~IslaamMaged126 14:59, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Tamara Davies, you will be blocked from editing. Creating a page of fictitious information for a WP:BLP. David Broadfoot (talk) 15:19, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Bruce Seldon. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. [8] David Broadfoot (talk) 15:23, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Carrie Snodgress, you will be blocked from editing. [9] David Broadfoot (talk) 15:25, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Ivan Drago, you will be blocked from editing. [10] David Broadfoot (talk) 15:27, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Actress Tamara Davies in her 2005 film Black Dawn.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Actress Tamara Davies in her 2005 film Black Dawn.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 03:38, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Deborah Joel plays Skinless Julia in the film's most intense scene.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Deborah Joel plays Skinless Julia in the film's most intense scene.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:36, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Julia(Clare Higgins) finishes Kyle (William Hope).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Julia(Clare Higgins) finishes Kyle (William Hope).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:43, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Clare Higgins and William Hope.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Clare Higgins and William Hope.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:17, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Clare Higgins and William Hope.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Clare Higgins and William Hope.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 03:38, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Actress Tamara Davies in her 2005 film Black Dawn.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Actress Tamara Davies in her 2005 film Black Dawn.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:37, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't replace free images with non-free

You replaced a free image in article Ned Beatty with a non-free image(Image:Ned Beatty in the brutal Deliverance.png) on 28 May 2008. Please don't do that. The non-free image will likely be deleted soon. --Apoc2400 (talk) 14:41, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Gella Vandecaveye in action, from the film Tatami.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Gella Vandecaveye in action, from the film Tatami.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:09, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]