User talk:Ricardochao

Hello, Ricardochao, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! Fæ (talk) 09:32, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard - a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

May 2010

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Yolanda Soares. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Fæ (talk) 09:33, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Ricardochao. You have new messages at Fæ's talk page.
Message added 09:49, 23 May 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Fæ (talk) 09:49, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Yolanda Soares. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:14, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Portuguese people, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The Ogre (talk) 10:37, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

TFOWR 16:00, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

--PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:25, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]