User talk:Rhmoore

Welcome!

Hello, Rhmoore, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Mak emi 16:44, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --rhmoore 20:37, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on criteria for articles

Hi there. I read your post on the newcomers help page. I'm a little confused by your question. Do you mean a place to discuss the deleting policy for articles (ie. the policy that dictates which articles should be kept and which should be deleted)? If this is what you mean, the page you are looking for is: Wikipedia:Deletion policy. To discuss matters involving the deletion policy, go to the "discussion" tab on the top of the page. Here is a direct link to it: Wikipedia talk:Deletion policy. I hope this was what your were looking for, if not, please feel free to drop me a note on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. - Akamad 09:26, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The idea of notability for individuals can be rather subjective. That's why there are guideline pages dedicated to them: Wikipedia:Notability (people), and a detailed one for musicians: Wikipedia:Notability (music). Many users do use the Google test when determining the notability of a subject. You might want to look at this page: Wikipedia:Search engine test. I haven't read it myself, but it seems to give a general overview of how and when to apply the Google test, and also its shortcomings. - Akamad 11:00, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. - Akamad 21:28, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Just saw you there Category:Grandfather Wikipedians, and dropped in to say hello. Nice meeting you. --Bhadani 14:21, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For the children (Grand ones!) - you are also "allowed" to share. --Bhadani 17:21, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question

I was looking at the article for "Myran" and thought it should be nomintated for deletion. I inserted the tag, then clicked on the "Please share your thoughts on the matter at this article's entry on the Articles for deletion page." link and it took me to an archived discussion of deletion on that article, and showed that the article should have been deleted in October of 2005. Did I make a mistake? Do I need to do anything else? Thanks rhmoore 23:03, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't do any mistakes, all you have to do, is to subst the afd1 template, and change the link to for example articlename (afd2) or something similar. This way the previous afd is kept, while a new one is started as well. Hope this helps, if not, don't hesitate to contact me! Bjelleklang - talk 23:15, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benedict Huang

Greetings Mr Ronald Moore. For your information, I have given evidence that I think that this is a pure hoax. Regards, ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! - review me 08:02, 28 April 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Regarding your question (AFD)

As long as the AFD still is running, the article exists. If the outcome is to delete the article, this will happen. Bjelleklang - talk 17:58, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Newbie kind of question

I checked my "watchlist" and I saw the following had been changed on my User Page - Rfrisbie (Talk | contribs) (Userfied to . See WP:GUS. using AWB)

Now, this was on an "Independent Catholic" userbox. As far as I could see it did not change the look of the page at all. I reverted it, but I wondered why it was made, and what it meant. Should I have left it alone? Thanks rhmoore 01:13, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

From what you said the edit summary says, my guess is that Rfrisbie moved a userbox from the Template space to {{User:UBX/Ind Catholic}}, and updated your userpage so that the template was still there. It may have been up for deletion or something. Hope that helps. --JD[^{don't talk}|_email] 01:16, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Thanks

Ahhh, that's what that was about. :) I was trying to figure that one out, but forgot to message you about it (rather persistent vandal proved distracting). Those things happen, glad it's cleared up. Happy editing! Luna Santin 09:47, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I still find formatting an issue myself; I find opening other articles to see how tehey did it there works. Sabine's Sunbird talk 16:47, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Belated Thanks for your comments on my page.

Dadaji represents divinity. I wonder how people, who once referred to him as god are now trying to spoil his name. They are trying very hard. There are a lot of charitable, religious and spiritual organisations in the world, but I bet that very few can survive without demanding funds from the public/other source. Surprisingly, pandurang shastri brought up the swadhyay parivar in this manner. He had taken an 'ayaachak vrath' (which means not to ask for anything for the purpose of his spiritual activity - god will send help if he wants this activity to work). I have been a part of this spiritual movement since 7 years but I have not been asked for a single Rupee.

Tubists or tuba players?

Removed cfdnotice, cfd has completed. --Kbdank71 16:38, 9 May 2008 (UTC) In fact, the discussion covers whether the main category and all of its sub-categories should be Category:Tubaists, Category:Tubists or Category:Tuba players, and so on. Please take any views you have to the discussion page there.[reply]
I think that people that know what they are talking about should comment, because there are things being written like, "'tubists' seems clearly incorrect ... to judge by the ... comments."
In the absence of knowledgeable discussion, an outcome based on ignorance can result.
I'm not getting the impression that most of the participants are serious tubists. -- Rico 04:26, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:RotaryIntLogo.png

Hello Rhmoore, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:RotaryIntLogo.png) was found at the following location: User:Rhmoore. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 07:44, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:WallsLines.gif

The file File:WallsLines.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]