User talk:Rheesmusic

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

You have received these suggestions because we are currently running a study to see if SuggestBot is helpful for newly registered Wikipedia editors. Normally SuggestBot only makes suggestions for users who ask for them explicitly on the SuggestBot request page. We will not post suggestions on your talk page again unless you ask for them. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find a complete consent form with contact information on the SuggestBot Study page.

Stubs 5.1 Music Disc DVD-D Window Clippings Digital eXtreme Definition EcoDisc CD-ROM XA VCDHD Apple ISO 9660 Extensions Videophile High-Resolution High-Definition Forecar Packet writing History of optical storage media Marketing Institute of Singapore In utero QuakeSat Duophonic LRK HD-MAC

Cleanup Ultra Density Optical Manhattan Project Multiple sub-Nyquist sampling encoding Merge Pita Bin-centres California Bungalow Add Sources Direct Stream Digital Hi-MD Jitter Wikify Clark Hewitt Galloway Twyla Tharp Akai VK (videocassette format) Expand Mount Rainier (packet writing) Optical disc authoring DVD-Audio

SuggestBot picks the articles you might be interested in based on the articles you've edited and using a number of different techniques: following links from them to other articles, matching articles based on their content, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedia users. It tries to recommend only articles that others have marked as needing work, such as stub articles that need to be made longer, clean-up articles that need writing help, and so on. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you choose to participate we encourage you to leave feedback on these suggestions, which you can most easily do here by editing your user talk page. We'll stop by later to read them.

Regards, Nettrom (talk), project researcher and SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:44, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

September 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at American Conservatory of Music. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. If you wish, discuss on the talk page there. If you claim the school is continuous, contrary to what appears to be the documented facts, give some reliable independent sources there. Please do not attempt to edit the actual article further until it's resolved in this manner. DGG ( talk ) 19:46, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

My edit was not vandalism at all. I merely flagged the article appropriately and made a small change to the category flags, plus restored a link to its web site to reflect that the Conservatory is indeed a valid post-secondary institution. The Conservatory remains in continuous operation, and has been in operation, since the year 1886. The chairman of the board of the Illinois entity, in July, 1991, gave his approval to the continuation of the American Conservatory of Music in a published Chicago Tribune article that appeared on July 28, 1991, at the time of its rescue. Eurodog has misrepresented the facts and appears to have a heavy bias in favor of the position that the State of Illinois has taken. Rheesmusic (talk) 20:39, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

October 2011

Please do not add inappropriate content for the purposes of promotion, as you did to American Conservatory of Music. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DGG ( talk ) 04:37, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

as far as I can determine, you are editing in opposition to the plain facts of the matter, apparently to promote a commercial entity that you seem to be associated with. If you continue doing this, I shall ask some other administrator to confirm my view of the matter, and block you from further participation. Frankly, the only question in my mind is whether the section on attempted continuations belongs in the article at all. Any further involvement on your part would seem to me to be very highly counterproductive. Wikipedia will not let itself be used for the purposes of promotion or advertising. DGG ( talk ) 04:41, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

I'm going to give you some further advice how to deal with it, in your best interests: add what discussion of the issues you like, but add it to the talk page. Putting what you did at the head of the article was very highly improper, and I think would strike most people as deliberate vandalism, and most admins would probably have simply blocked you for it. I almost never do that, and I want to avoid it if at all possible. DGG ( talk ) 04:52, 26 October 2011 (UTC)