User talk:Rford77

October 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pittsburgh Penguins. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Gloss 14:52, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above comments were left by a Wikipedia Editor, Gloss who, apparently suffers from an infliction of Stick up Ass-itis, given that the vandalism in question was to refer to the Pittsburgh Penguins as "Classy" due to their tribute to Canada and the 2014 shootings at Parliament Hill, Ottawa

Your submission at Articles for creation: Glenmore Athletic Park (October 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft has only one reference.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Glenmore Athletic Park and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:47, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Rford77, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:47, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Glenmore Athletic Park

Hello, Rford77. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Glenmore Athletic Park".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 15:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Murray Costello

On 31 July 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Murray Costello, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 19:55, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]