User talk:Rfewerw

February 2023

Hello, I'm HMSLavender. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ned Lamont have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 02:00, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at John Lee Ka-chiu. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: John Lee Ka-chiu was changed by Rfewerw (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.931581 on 2023-02-04T02:00:31+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:00, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding {{unblock|your reason here}} below this notice. Materialscientist (talk) 02:01, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]