User talk:Reza eskandari04

July 2024

Hello, I'm Meters. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Lactic acid bacteria have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. What are you doing? Don't just drop unrelated mentions of a journal article into the lead Meters (talk) 07:56, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Stenocereus stellatus. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 07:57, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Heyndrickxia coagulans. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Stop spamming that journal. You have done this on multiple articles. Meters (talk) 08:00, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:33, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Nilzzz7 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nilzzz7. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

RoySmith (talk) 00:36, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]