Jump to content

User talk:Reyk/Archive6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Three-pronged test for Elements of Fiction

[edit]

I have drafted a revsion to WP:FICT that may address some of your concerns. I would be grateful for your views at WT:FICT#Three-pronged test for Elements of Fiction. --Gavin Collins (talk) 00:50, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost, January 10, 2009

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 5, Issue 2 10 January 2009 About the Signpost
News and notes:Flagged Revisions and permissions proposals, hoax, milestones Wikipedia in the news 
Dispatches: December themed Main Page Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)§hepBot (Disable) 20:17, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost, January 17, 2009

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 5, Issue 3 17 January 2009 About the Signpost
News and notes: New board members, changes at ArbCom Wikipedia in the news 
Dispatches: Featured article writers—the 2008 leaders WikiProject Report: WikiProject Pharmacology 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 00:53, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

243 Ida

[edit]

We're very close to being ready to start writing this article. I was wondering if you might be up for an intensive wiki-thon at some point in the next week or so where we would write the whole thing in one swell foop. I can block out about four hours for it. Wronkiew (talk) 07:40, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm extraordinarily busy in RL at the moment, don't know if I'll be able to put aside four hours but I will try to put in some work on Thursday and Friday night. Reyk YO! 09:17, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Cool. If you can make some headway on it then I'll do some writing this weekend, hopefully enough to satisfy the DYK criteria. If you don't have time right now, I understand. Wronkiew (talk) 08:19, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Also I was thinking that we could work on it in article space, as long as we can substantially finish writing it in the next five days. Wronkiew (talk) 16:41, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have my doubts if it can be finished that quickly. Reyk YO! 21:41, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Alright then, we write it on the collaboration page. I'll call dibs on sections I want to write before I start working on them, so we don't duplicate work. After we're done writing, we each move the sections that we wrote over to article space. Does this sound okay? I'm glad that the end is in sight. The article is going to be spectacular! Wronkiew (talk) 05:27, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, sounds good. I'm also very optimistic about how this article is going to turn out. Reyk YO! 06:21, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Congrats on the GA

[edit]

Thank you! It is now, btw, listed at FAC: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Flywheel, Shyster, and Flywheel. Please comment on how you think it may be improved. Regards, Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 17:37, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost, January 24, 2009

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 5, Issue 4 24 January 2009 About the Signpost
Jimbo requests that developers turn on Flagged Revisions Report on accessing Wikipedia via mobile devices 
News and notes: New chapters, new jobs, new knight and more Wikipedia in the news: Britannica, Kennedy, Byrd not dead yet 
Dispatches: Reviewing featured picture candidates Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered at 04:54, 25 January 2009 (UTC) by §hepBot (Disable)

Ida notes

[edit]

If you wouldn't mind, can you leave the notes in place? It'll help later if we need to change things in response to reviews. Wronkiew (talk) 07:41, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it looks like you were right. This is going to take longer to write than I thought. I'm going to get some sleep now. Great work so far. Wronkiew (talk) 08:22, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Meh. My Crater section is a bit of a dog's breakfast. I struggle to write prose well, especially if the information is a lot of random facts that are hard to organize into a cohesive whole. I'll have another look at it tomorrow. Reyk YO! 08:34, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry I haven't been making progress on the article recently. I have to finish up a long-neglected GA review, and then I'll be back to writing. Wronkiew (talk) 06:47, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I had some random thoughts about the article. Almost all the sections are done except for a bunch of the Dactyl ones. We could just write a summary of it for the DYK stage, and then flesh it out afterwards. I'm a little worried that if we pull in the Dactyl article now, we'll have to do a 5x expansion of that material as well. Also, with only two sections plus the summary left to go, we could move it into article space this weekend! The other thing is that the copy of the original article is just taking up space on the (bloated) workpage, so I think I'm going to delete it. Wronkiew (talk) 07:32, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • I think we're going to need the Dactyl stuff to meet the 5x expansion. I've been keeping a little tally: the original article contains 654 words, so for a fivefold expansion the final version needs to be 3270 words or more. Currently we're at about 2250 (70% of what we need), and that's including all the Dactyl material. I do agree though about having the current article in the workpage- I've got rid of it. Reyk YO! 08:21, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How's our word count now? Wronkiew (talk) 06:05, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move to article space on Friday? Wronkiew (talk) 05:47, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and nominated it at WP:GAN. Wronkiew (talk) 06:09, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Responses

[edit]

This is Dallezam. You sent me a letter to remove a contribution - fine, no hard feelings. As a result I have temporarily removed the write up. I have a list as to why it is important to the NLL but no sources because these are rare. I honestly think that I am the only person who owns this tape.

Wikipedia Signpost, January 31, 2009

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 5, Issue 5 31 January 2009 About the Signpost
Large portion of articles are orphans News and notes: Ogg support, Wikipedia Loves Art, Jimbo honored 
Wikipedia in the news: Flagged Revisions, Internet Explorer add-on Dispatches: In the news 
WikiProject Report: Motto of the Day Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 21:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost, February 8, 2009

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 5, Issue 6 8 February 2009 About the Signpost
News and notes: Elections, licensing update, and more Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia's future, WikiDashboard, and "wiki-snobs" 
Dispatches: April Fools 2009 mainpage WikiProject Report: WikiProject Music 
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation 
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:47, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RFA thankspam

[edit]

Thank you for weighing in at my RFA. Someday we should get back to finishing our work on Geelong Football Club! :) Somno (talk) 06:11, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost — February 16, 2009

[edit]
The Signpost
Volume 5, Issue 7
Weekly Delivery
2009-02-16

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist.
If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 07:30, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost — February 23, 2009

[edit]

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:

The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 21:39, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion at Talk:Tom Tucker (Family Guy)

[edit]

I've opened a merge discussion at the above-mentioned location. Please consider participating if you are interested. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 20:31, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost — 2 March 2009

[edit]

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 08:36, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Interstellar comet

[edit]
Updated DYK query On March 3, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Interstellar comet, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Shubinator (talk) 05:35, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this

[edit]

Please note that sources do attest to its notability, i.e. "the story most familiar with US audiences" and that is verifiable in published books. Best, --A NobodyMy talk 22:56, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability (Fiction)

[edit]

There seems to be some progress being made towards redrafting the guideline. Most of the arguments for a permissive guideline seem to have been countered in the sense that they have been found not to be viable. My attempts to obtain a compromise earlier this year seem to be leading towards a slightly stricter applciation of WP:V for fiction that should discourage topics which are only the subject of in universe plot summary, trivia and cruft. A recent post at WT:FICT#The rules seems to make this clear. Can you provide some cool and clear support towards drafting a compromise that is compliant with existing Wikipedia policies and guidelines? --Gavin Collins (talk) 19:32, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notablility (populated places)

[edit]

I would like to draw your attention to this discussion. OrangeDog (talk • edits) 14:41, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Book of Time (novel series)

[edit]

You are invited to revisit the article. I know you may yourself have had trouble with sources for the title... but I was just determined enough to dig until I found the gold. The article is now sourced and includes some nice reviews. Thanks. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 05:33, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ranga Ediriwickrama

[edit]
Updated DYK query On March 6, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ranga Ediriwickrama, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

DYK for 243 Ida

[edit]
Updated DYK query On March 7, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 243 Ida, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Dravecky (talk) 23:34, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Way to go! I'm sad I missed seeing it on the front page. Now that word count is no longer an issue, I deleted one of your sections. Wronkiew (talk) 05:34, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ready for peer review? Wronkiew (talk) 16:29, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of SDF-1 Macross

[edit]

SDF-1 Macross has been nominated for deletion and you were involved in a previous AfD about a different article involving the same cartoon series. You are invited to comment on the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SDF-1 Macross. Thank you.--Sloane (talk) 00:49, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost — 9 March 2009

[edit]

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 00:34, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Take Care

[edit]

Please don't use Science Apologist's talk page to have long and involved discussions with users that are not SA. This has caused problems in the past. Thanks. Hipocrite (talk) 12:49, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


The Wikipedia Signpost  — 16 March 2009

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 23:42, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments on proposal

[edit]

Hi, as you participated in the village pump discussion, I'd like to draw your attention to this proposal. Further input is welcome. OrangeDog (talk • edits) 12:36, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 23 March 2009

[edit]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:29, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Titan

[edit]

Sorry about that. I'm in the middle of a bit of an edit war. Wish I could resolve it peacefully. Serendipodous 21:25, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry also- I am the other party. I think we will resolve this happily. Fotaun (talk) 21:54, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Not a problem. Happy editing. Reyk YO! 22:02, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pixelface

[edit]

Hi, I was offline yesterday; a local holiday. I'm all for sorting this issue. Cheers, Jack Merridew 02:41, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, done. Reyk YO! 04:03, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I just commented there. I'll also let Cas and Moreschi know. Cheers, Jack Merridew 04:14, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 30 March 2009

[edit]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 20:28, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Schlund

[edit]

The decision to delete the article Dan Schlund is now being reviewed. You have been sent this message because you have previously been involved in the AfD discussion(s) concerning this article. If you are interested in the review discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 April 3. Thank you. Esasus (talk) 15:50, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 6 April 2009

[edit]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:36, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you get a chance...

[edit]

I've posted a question about your comments here [1]. Thanks! Hobit (talk) 04:28, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, could you head back to it and see if the sources provided on the talk page are sufficient to address the issues with WP:N? Thanks! Hobit (talk) 14:17, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

More Ida

[edit]

Now that the peer review is winding down, I think it's time to move towards FAC. I'm mercilessly copyediting the article, but I haven't gotten very far. Also, I have nagging concerns about two sentences:

  • "Ida's spin axis coincides with its maximum moment of inertia, if its density is assumed to be even throughout." I'm not entirely sure what this means, and it's very close to the source.
  • "Dactyl's surface was initially thought to be composed of equal parts clinopyroxene and the silicate minerals olivine and orthopyroxene but later studies indicate that the evidence for clinopyroxene is 'weak'." The wording in this one is also kind of close to the source, but my main concern is that it doesn't really say anything about Dactyl, except that we don't know what it's made of. I had originally included this in the source notes to prevent us from including wrong information, and had not intended for it to be mentioned in the article.
    • I thought it was intended as an example of one of the differences between Ida and Dactyl, but on rereading it I think you're probably right that it isn't necessary. I'll head over now and take it out. Reyk YO! 05:50, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any remaining concerns? Wronkiew (talk) 06:42, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    • I think we've addressed all the concerns at the Peer Review, so I agree we should start moving it along to FAC. Reyk YO! 06:23, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      I'm not sure what we should do about moving the exploration section. My inclination is to wait and see what happens at FAC. Other then that, I still need to finish copyediting. I'll try to get that done this weekend. Might be time to close the peer review. Wronkiew (talk) 06:28, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      I noticed a few American/British spelling inconsistencies in the article while I was re-reading it. Do you want to go through and fix any words I may have, in my Yankee arrogance, misspelled? Wronkiew (talk) 07:12, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ready? Wronkiew (talk) 00:53, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Go for it! Reyk YO! 01:12, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, add your statement to Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/243 Ida/archive1. Wronkiew (talk) 01:36, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Now I think I'll give a heads up to the people who have reviewed it at GA or Peer Review. Reyk YO! 01:47, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RFA thanks

[edit]
My RFA passed today at 61/5/4. Thanks for participating in my RFA. I appreciate all the comments I received and will endeavor to justify the trust the WP community has placed in me. Have a nice day. :-) AdjustShift (talk) 21:06, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No worries. Reyk YO! 21:07, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Easter!

[edit]

I don't know how well this message will be received as I know you and I have had been on the opposite sides of various discussions and issues, but you know I really don't want to view anyone as an actual opponent or enemy. I think of a lot of these things, even when heated as polite or academic disagreements and as it is a holiday, well, on behalf of the Kindness campaign, I just wanted to wish my fellow Wikipedians a Happy Easter! Maybe somewhere along the way we'll even find somewhere to agree and help each other out!  :) Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 06:55, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I think it's fair to say we don't see eye to eye on a great many things. Still, no hard feelings (though I'm pretty certain I'll disagree with you about things in the future) and have a good holiday. Reyk YO! 07:04, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, you too! Regards, --A NobodyMy talk 07:12, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 13 April 2009

[edit]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 16:47, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:FloraOrbit.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:FloraOrbit.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:07, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Automatic processing of your editor review

[edit]

This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 21 April 2009 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. End of line. DustyBot (talk) 03:54, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Reyk/Archive6&oldid=1083448779"