User talk:Revtswan2
Image copyright problem with Image:RevTalbertWSwanII.jpg
[edit]
Thank you for uploading Image:RevTalbertWSwanII.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:06, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
This article is a blatant copyvio from the [1] website, and is also redundant when considering that there already exists an Iota Phi Theta article. As such, I have put it up for speedy delete. Justinm1978 (talk) 19:10, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Rev. Swan article
[edit]According to the log, your article was moved to your userspace (User:Revtswan2) by another editor, likely because your article didn't really indicate notability the first time around, and possibly because it would appear that you are in a conflict of interest given your username. The result of this was what is known as a cross-namespace redirect. The article you created was redirecting readers to your userpage. My deletion of the redirect was nothing more than housekeeping, as such redirects are not useful. Regards, Resolute 00:24, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Rev. Talbert W. Swan, II
[edit]I have nominated Rev. Talbert W. Swan, II, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rev. Talbert W. Swan, II. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Ravenswing 13:46, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi Talbert
Just so you are aware, your article Rev. Talbert W. Swan, II is being proposed for deletion because the subject is not notable enough for Wikipedia. You are free to disagree by adding your comments, as above.
Please also note that writing articles about yourself is strongly discouraged, and allowed only in exceptional circumstances. If you are famous enough to warrant an article someone else will write one. Feel free to edit other Wikipedia articles. DJ Clayworth (talk) 17:42, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
The file File:RevTalbertWSwanII.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
