User talk:Revetec

Image tagging for Image:Revetec03 dyno.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Revetec03 dyno.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:12, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Revetec2003cut.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Revetec2003cut.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:12, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:RevetecRHL4.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:RevetecRHL4.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:40, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:RevetecRHL4cad.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:RevetecRHL4cad.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:15, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism warnings

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Controlled Combustion Engine. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 21:48, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise removal of other peoples comments on the Talk page is exceedingly poor wikiquette. Do not do it again. If you want to remove stuff then you need to discuss why. Greg Locock (talk) 01:27, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Editors' Assistance/Requests

^{From WP:EAR}

I don't really see it as "bigging up the company's profile" because the information is actually factual. What I must point out is that Wikipedia is actually an encyclopaedia with editors who edit according to a style guide. Research and Development is not an excuse to ignore Wikipedia's rules on format and prose. We are not a bulletin board. Please carry on contributing because (a) it helps debunk any doubts readers and editors have about it being an overly projected article (b) You have up-to-date information about an ongoing design and (c) you are a major editor of the article.

I would say that although it is not a major article it does have interest and has numerous linked in articles, but standard formatting does help make Wikipedia look and feel reliable. -- BpEps - t@lk 12:00, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Bradenginewikipedia.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:08, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]