User talk:Revertavid

February 2020

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Joanna Gosling—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 08:41, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Tim Willcox. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 08:43, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This case is pretty important I think. I was surprised to find no mention of it in the three presenters pages - HMRC usually lose these cases. Revertavid (talk) 08:44, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In what way are they not constructive? I’ve no axe to grind, love the info Wiki gives me... Could I have added the info in a more constructive manner? I was hoping someone better qualified would take my edit & expand on it. please advise. Thanks Revertavid (talk) 08:48, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Revertavid! You created a thread called How to make this edit acceptable? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]