User talk:Revert time

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Revert time", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because reverting is the process of undoing another editor's contributions on Wikipedia, which might make your username seem distruptive. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Clovermoss (talk) 23:29, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As my name suggests I revert vandalism, but I do not do disruptive editing or vandalize. It does not seem like you are assuming good faith. My username has no negativity. ThanksRevert time (talk) 23:32, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am trying to assume good faith. I'm sorry my assumption was that you were here to cause trouble. I'm glad that you're here to help and would like to revert vandalism. You might find the Counter Vandalism Academy interesting. Clovermoss (talk) 23:38, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from LGBT rights by country or territory into LGBT rights in Africa. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:25, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]