User talk:ReverendSpecialK

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Battlelog.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! LukeSurl^{t c} 10:28, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Battlelog concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Battlelog, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:07, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Battlelog

Hello ReverendSpecialK. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Battlelog".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Battlelog}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. —Anne Delong (talk) 04:01, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft_talk:Devil's_song#Notability

Please discuss there, thank you. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:43, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Kholm Pocket. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:22, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vienna. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 09:31, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You've removed the section Famous Jewish cultural figures from Vienna on the article Vienna three times now. Your edit summary on December 24: "Removed the section as it belongs as it's own page. Notable figures should not be so categorically specific." That's nonsense. There's an article about the History of the Jews in Vienna and as such, it should be mentioned on the main article. Please stop removing it. Thanks. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 09:36, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, could you please explain why you are making this change [1]? K.e.coffman (talk) 01:26, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @K.e.coffman:, I've reverted it. Perhaps a warning is in order, since ReverendSpecialK doesn't seem to be willing to communicate. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 08:42, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looking through their edits, this one from March is also problematic. ReverendSpecialK, please change your editing attitude and stop adding POV points to articles. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 08:51, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kholm Pocket, you may be blocked from editing. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 05:35, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kholm Pocket. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 23:15, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:52, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change content without sources or introduce original research, as you did at Nazi songs, you may be blocked from editing. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:35, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am pretty sure that we are not needing the words for the songs on an encyclopaedic article; typically it is not done, especially consider copyright issues. Also similarly, typically we would not link to recordings of works for similar respect to copyright production, Anyway, rather than continuing to just add the lyrics, please take to the talk page and see if we can reach a consensus. — billinghurst sDrewth 22:58, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

When you are requested to take something to the talk page, how about you do it. Reverting an administrator and telling them that they are wrong is a very brave thing to do, especially when you have already in a reversion battle. I think that you would do well to do more listening, and looking to use the talk pages more. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:34, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Noticeboard discussion notice

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:ReverendSpecialK.

--K.e.coffman (talk) 03:23, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 07:50, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My unblock conditions

Simply agree to a topic ban on Nazi and Jewish related text. Doug Weller talk 07:52, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll agree to that, if you let me get a close up look of that pumpkin head of yours so we can discuss it. I'm willing to travel to the UK. Let me know if you're interested. ReverendSpecialK (talk) 18:10, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]