User talk:Revenues-expense=netincome

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Alice's Adventures in Wonderland, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Alice's Adventures in Wonderland was changed by Revenues-expense=netincome (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.869353 on 2011-02-28T19:37:58+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:38, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 20:03, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints was changed by Revenues-expense=netincome (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.904095 on 2011-03-03T23:40:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:41, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Zachlipton (talk) 00:46, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dreadstar ☥ 04:40, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Revenues-expense=netincome (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My reason is because I understand now that what I was doing was wrong. I was just making humor and it was inapropriate to the setting. I was trying to make jokes based on some stupid comments some of my friends have made. I also understand I need to stop setting up additional wikipedia accounts.Revenues-expense=netincome (talk) 11:51, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You vandalised Wikipedia numerous times for over a month from various accounts and IP addresses, despite several warnings. Your vandalism included several times announcing that you had seen the error of your ways and would stop, but you were still vandalising. It is difficult, therefore, to take seriously another statement to the same effect. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:34, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.