User talk:RevTarthpeigust

Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. Be bold in editing pages. Here are some links that you might find useful:

Try the Tutorial. If you have less time, try Wikipedia:How to edit a page.
To sign your posts (for eg. on talk pages) use ~~~~ (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes).
You can experiment in the Sandbox.
For help, see Wikipedia:Where to ask a question.
Some other pages that will help you know more about Wikipedia: Manual of Style and Wikipedia:Five pillars, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Civility, Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not
You can contribute in many ways: write a great article, fight vandalism, upload pictures, perform maintainance tasks, contribute to existing projects...

I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. Drop us a note at Wikipedia:New user log.

-- utcursch | talk 06:04, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Cheng

Thank you for spotting that this article was inappropriate. However, a deletion notice sbould be added and the page should not be blanked. If it is a non-notable biography, add {{{Db-bio}}} (one extra set of brackets added to prevent this page being nominated!)--File Éireann 20:18, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hugh Selwyn Mauberley

Hi. Thanks for the note. The article definitely needs a lot more work and I encourage you to add more material. Articles on individual poems have a bit of a habit of turning into personal essays, going against the wikipedia policy of no original research ... therefore it is particularly important to cite reliable sources so others can verify the content. For example, the article on The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock has been greatly improved by the addition of footnotes (see Wikipedia:Footnotes). I'm away from my library at the moment so can't help out with much of referencing at the moment. My overall impression is that the material re HSM seems ok, although there could be a lot more, but that we need to back it up with references, but that there is also a some 'off-target' stuff where the content strays into broader discussion.

By the way, I'm not sure if you are aware of the Poetry Portal ... if not, you might be interested in helping out with it ... the content changes every week and we always need help in preparing content for future weeks (you can do this by clicking on the Archive link in each panel which takes you to past and future entries). There is also Wikipedia:WikiProject Poetry which is not very active at the moment, but it might provide a place for coordinating efforts to fill in some of the big poetry gaps in wikipedia. Cheers. Stumps 06:22, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Super Chikan article lack of references

In the Super Chikan article, the sources of your information are not referenced. Could you do so per WP:V and WP:CITE? Thanks! Mattisse (talk) 22:43, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:8habits tn.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:8habits tn.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:54, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:8habits tn.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:8habits tn.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:35, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bloodcircus.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bloodcircus.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 08:15, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey y'all!

We're going to be having our first Mississippi meetup next month, and I would love it if you'd like to come out! A few of us will be staying overnight, so if you feel up to it, we could have a meet and greet that night and then breakfast the next morning and talk about Wikipedia and everyone's areas of expertise. Let's show 'em how it's done Southern-style! Mike H. Fierce! 21:31, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, RevTarthpeigust. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]