User talk:Reunited7777

May 2023

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bilby (talk) 00:19, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Reunited7777 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Today I have logged in and found that my account has been banned. I kindly request clarification regarding the reason behind this action.

To address any potential concern regarding the accusation of being a sockpuppet, I must emphasize that I do not possess multiple accounts. This particular account is the only one associated with me. While I have previously made edits to Wikipedia in prior years, it has always been from an IP, but I have never utilized an additional account.

Furthermore, I have used my home IP. Hence, it is impossible for anyone else to have accessed my IP, unless it was previously assigned to someone else before I obtained it. May I inquire whether any evidence has been found indicating the usage of my IP by another individual?

I kindly request a prompt and thorough investigation into this matter in order to rectify any misunderstandings and restore my account's status accordingly. I appreciate your attention to this concern and look forward to your response.Reunited7777 (talk) 19:32, 5 June 2023 (UTC) (talk) 19:32, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Once I found out who the sockmaster is, it's pretty clear this is a sock, and the denial does not convince me a bit. And nobody said anything about your IP—you've got some previous experience in that regard, perhaps? Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 00:50, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Seraphimblade Is it common practice to ban accounts without providing any evidence? To which account am I accused to be linked to??? How did you decide this? Please explain. How is this "Pretty clear it is sock" ???? Thanks.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Reunited7777 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked and accused of having multiple accounts. This is not true. I only made this one account. In addition, no evidence has been provided as to why the admins think I have multiple account other than the last admin saying "it is pretty clear this is a sock." I would think that you should give the benefit of the doubt when you do not have any evidence. I have checked history of some others that were banned and there is usually evidence provided, such as accounts that have multiple edits in common or using the same IP. No evidence has been provided in my case.

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is not a court of law, and admin do not need to outline the evidence against anyone. Future unblock requests should address your relationship to Expertwikiguy, and more information can be found on your user page. Z1720 (talk) 17:54, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hide and Seek (2023 film) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Hide and Seek (2023 film). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because as a result of a article for deletion discussion. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Let'srun (talk) 19:30, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]